Literature DB >> 22610836

Closing the loop: action research in a multimodal hereditary cancer patient conference is an effective tool to assess and address patient needs.

Carin R Espenschied1, Deborah J MacDonald, Julie O Culver, Sharon Sand, Karen Hurley, Kimberly C Banks, Jeffrey N Weitzel, Kathleen R Blazer.   

Abstract

This paper describes the use of action research in a patient conference to provide updated hereditary cancer information, explore patient and family member needs and experiences related to genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA), elicit feedback on how to improve the GCRA process, and inform future research efforts. Invitees completed GCRA at City of Hope or collaborating facilities and had a BRCA mutation or a strong personal or family history of breast cancer. Action research activities were facilitated by surveys, round table discussions, and reflection time to engage participants, faculty, and researchers in multiple cycles of reciprocal feedback. The multimodal action research design effectively engaged conference participants to share their experiences, needs, and ideas for improvements to the GCRA process. Participants indicated that they highly valued the information and resources provided and desired similar future conferences. The use of action research in a patient conference is an innovative and effective approach to provide health education, elicit experiences, identify and help address needs of high-risk patients and their family members, and generate research hypotheses. Insights gained yielded valuable feedback to inform clinical care, future health services research, and continuing medical education activities. These methods may also be effective in other practice settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22610836      PMCID: PMC3540105          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-012-0373-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  26 in total

1.  Support groups for people carrying a BRCA mutation.

Authors:  M Dorval; E Maunsell; M J Dugas; J Simard
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Genetic cancer risk assessment in the newly diagnosed breast cancer patient is useful and possible in practice.

Authors:  Melanie R Palomares; Benjamin Paz; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  A specialist nurse as a resource for family members to patients with brain tumors: an action research study.

Authors:  Agneta Spetz; Roger Henriksson; Pär Salander
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.592

4.  The Unmet Information and Support Needs of Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer: A Descriptive Survey.

Authors:  Belinda Thewes; Bettina Meiser; Monica Tucker; Kathy Tucker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors.

Authors:  Angela Trepanier; Mary Ahrens; Wendy McKinnon; June Peters; Jill Stopfer; Sherry Campbell Grumet; Susan Manley; Julie O Culver; Ronald Acton; Joy Larsen-Haidle; Lori Ann Correia; Robin Bennett; Barbara Pettersen; Terri Diamond Ferlita; Josephine Wagner Costalas; Katherine Hunt; Susan Donlon; Cecile Skrzynia; Carolyn Farrell; Faith Callif-Daley; Catherine Walsh Vockley
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Extending comprehensive cancer center expertise in clinical cancer genetics and genomics to diverse communities: the power of partnership.

Authors:  Deborah J MacDonald; Kathleen R Blazer; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 11.908

7.  Women's perceptions of the personal and family impact of genetic cancer risk assessment: focus group findings.

Authors:  Deborah J MacDonald; Linda Sarna; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Betty Ferrell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Cancer genetic predisposition: information needs of patients irrespective of risk level.

Authors:  Alison Metcalfe; Julie Werrett; Lucy Burgess; Cyril Chapman; Collette Clifford
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Experiences of genetic counseling for BRCA1/2 among recently diagnosed breast cancer patients: a qualitative inquiry.

Authors:  Susan T Vadaparampil; Gwendolyn Pickard Quinn; Jennifer Brzosowicz; Cheryl A Miree
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2008

Review 10.  Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Fiona Walter; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

View more
  4 in total

1.  Experience Gained from the Development and Execution of a Multidisciplinary Multi-syndrome Hereditary Colon Cancer Family Conference.

Authors:  Ilana Solomon; Christina Rybak; Lily Van Tongeren; Lili Kuzmich; Kathleen Blazer; Bita Nehoray; Mariana Niell-Swiller; Shawnie Bray; Travis H Bray; Karen Hurley; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Thomas P Slavin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Developing a Decision-Aid Website for Breast Cancer Surgery: An Action Research Approach.

Authors:  Ling-Ming Tseng; Shuh-Jen Sheu; Yu-Ting Hung; Ching-Fang Wu; Te-Hsin Liang; Shin-Shang Chou; Guan-Liang Chen; Pei-Ni Wu; Guan-Rong Su; Tsuey-Huah Jang; Chang-Yi Liu; Ching-Yen Wang
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Patient-reported disease knowledge and educational needs in Lynch syndrome: findings of an interactive multidisciplinary patient conference.

Authors:  Sarah A Bannon; Maureen Mork; Eduardo Vilar; Susan K Peterson; Karen Lu; Patrick M Lynch; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; Yiqian Nancy You
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 2.857

Review 4.  Community-based initiatives improving critical health literacy: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence.

Authors:  Liesbeth de Wit; Christine Fenenga; Cinzia Giammarchi; Lucia di Furia; Inge Hutter; Andrea de Winter; Louise Meijering
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.