Literature DB >> 17265124

Auditory prosthesis with a penetrating nerve array.

John C Middlebrooks1, Russell L Snyder.   

Abstract

Contemporary auditory prostheses ("cochlear implants") employ arrays of stimulating electrodes implanted in the scala tympani of the cochlea. Such arrays have been implanted in some 100,000 profoundly or severely deaf people worldwide and arguably are the most successful of present-day neural prostheses. Nevertheless, most implant users show poor understanding of speech in noisy backgrounds, poor pitch recognition, and poor spatial hearing, even when using bilateral implants. Many of these limitations can be attributed to the remote location of stimulating electrodes relative to excitable cochlear neural elements. That is, a scala tympani electrode array lies within a bony compartment filled with electrically conductive fluid. Moreover, scala tympani arrays typically do not extend to the apical turn of the cochlea in which low frequencies are represented. In the present study, we have tested in an animal model an alternative to the conventional cochlear implant: a multielectrode array implanted directly into the auditory nerve. We monitored the specificity of stimulation of the auditory pathway by recording extracellular unit activity at 32 sites along the tonotopic axis of the inferior colliculus. The results demonstrate the activation of specific auditory nerve populations throughout essentially the entire frequency range that is represented by characteristic frequencies in the inferior colliculus. Compared to conventional scala tympani stimulation, thresholds for neural excitation are as much as 50-fold lower and interference between electrodes stimulated simultaneously is markedly reduced. The results suggest that if an intraneural stimulating array were incorporated into an auditory prosthesis system for humans, it could offer substantial improvement in hearing replacement compared to contemporary cochlear implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17265124      PMCID: PMC2538356          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-007-0070-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  53 in total

1.  Response of inferior colliculus neurons to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in neonatally deafened cats.

Authors:  R K Shepherd; J H Baxi; N A Hardie
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. II: Comparison of Spiral Clarion and HiFocus II electrodes.

Authors:  Peter Wardrop; David Whinney; Stephen J Rebscher; William Luxford; Patricia Leake
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study.

Authors:  Lucas H M Mens; Carlo K Berenstein
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Pitch ranking ability of cochlear implant recipients: a comparison of sound-processing strategies.

Authors:  Andrew E Vandali; Catherine Sucher; David J Tsang; Colette M McKay; Jason W D Chew; Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spiral ganglion cell site of excitation I: comparison of scala tympani and intrameatal electrode responses.

Authors:  Lianne A Cartee; Charles A Miller; Chris van den Honert
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Music to electric ears: pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Daniel Pressnitzer; Julie Bestel; Bernard Fraysse
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function.

Authors:  Uwe Baumann; Andrea Nobbe
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Effects of stimulus configuration on psychophysical operating levels and on speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B E Pfingst; T A Zwolan; L A Holloway
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing.

Authors:  Colette Boëx; Lionel Baud; Grégoire Cosendai; Alain Sigrist; Maria-Izabel Kós; Marco Pelizzone
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-02-01

10.  AUDITORY NERVE: ELECTRICAL STIMULATION IN MAN.

Authors:  F B SIMMONS; J M EPLEY; R C LUMMIS; N GUTTMAN; L S FRISHKOPF; L D HARMON; E ZWICKER
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-04-02       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  60 in total

1.  Spatial extent of cochlear infrared neural stimulation determined by tone-on-light masking.

Authors:  Agnella Izzo Matic; Joseph T Walsh; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Detection of pulse trains in the electrically stimulated cochlea: effects of cochlear health.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Deborah J Colesa; Sheena Hembrador; Stephen Y Kang; John C Middlebrooks; Yehoash Raphael; Gina L Su
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Monopolar intracochlear pulse trains selectively activate the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Matthew C Schoenecker; Ben H Bonham; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-22

4.  Partial tripolar cochlear implant stimulation: Spread of excitation and forward masking in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; Steven M Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Raul Benítez; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; John C Middlebrooks; Ben H Bonham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Psychophysical assessment of stimulation sites in auditory prosthesis electrode arrays.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Rose A Burkholder-Juhasz; Teresa A Zwolan; Li Xu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Spatial stream segregation by auditory cortical neurons.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks; Peter Bremen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Current focusing and steering: modeling, physiology, and psychophysics.

Authors:  Ben H Bonham; Leonid M Litvak
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Effects of deafening and cochlear implantation procedures on postimplantation psychophysical electrical detection thresholds.

Authors:  Gina L Su; Deborah J Colesa; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.