Literature DB >> 16450213

Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing.

Colette Boëx1, Lionel Baud, Grégoire Cosendai, Alain Sigrist, Maria-Izabel Kós, Marco Pelizzone.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the frequency-position function resulting from electric stimulation of electrodes in cochlear implant subjects with significant residual hearing in their nonimplanted ear. Six cochlear implant users compared the pitch of the auditory sensation produced by stimulation of an intracochlear electrode to the pitch of acoustic pure tones presented to their contralateral nonimplanted ear. Subjects were implanted with different Clarion electrode arrays, designed to lie close to the inner wall of the cochlea. High-resolution radiographs were used to determine the electrode positions in the cochlea. Four out of six subjects presented electrode insertions deeper than 450 degrees . We used a two-interval (one acoustic, one electric), two-alternative forced choice protocol (2I-2AFC), asking the subject to indicate which stimulus sounded the highest in pitch. Pure tones were used as acoustic stimuli. Electric stimuli consisted of trains of biphasic pulses presented at relatively high rates [higher than 700 pulses per second (pps)]. First, all electric stimuli were balanced in loudness across electrodes. Second, acoustic pure tones, chosen to approximate roughly the pitch sensation produced by each electrode, were balanced in loudness to electric stimuli. When electrode insertion lengths were used to describe electrode positions, the pitch sensations produced by electric stimulation were found to be more than two octaves lower than predicted by Greenwood's frequency-position function. When insertion angles were used to describe electrode positions, the pitch sensations were found about one octave lower than the frequency-position function of a normal ear. The difference found between both descriptions is because of the fact that these electrode arrays were designed to lie close to the modiolus. As a consequence, the site of excitation produced at the level of the organ of Corti corresponds to a longer length than the electrode insertion length, which is used in Greenwood's function. Although exact measurements of the round window position as well as the length of the cochlea could explain the remaining one octave difference found when insertion angles were used, physiological phenomena (e.g., stimulation of the spiral ganglion cells) could also create this difference. From these data, analysis filters could be determined in sound coding strategies to match the pitch percepts elicited by electrode stimulation. This step might be of main importance for music perception and for the fitting of bilateral cochlear implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16450213      PMCID: PMC2504582          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-005-0027-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  45 in total

1.  The Clarion electrode positioner: temporal bone studies.

Authors:  J N Fayad; W Luxford; F H Linthicum
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-03

2.  Investigating perceptual features of electrode stimulation via a multidimensional scaling paradigm.

Authors:  L M Collins; C S Throckmorton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Contralateral masking in cochlear implant users with residual hearing in the non-implanted ear.

Authors:  C James; P Blamey; J K Shallop; P V Incerti; A M Nicholas
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems.

Authors:  Colette Boëx; Chloé de Balthasar; Maria-Izabel Kós; Marco Pelizzone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Computer-aided three-dimensional reconstruction in human cochlear maps: measurement of the lengths of organ of Corti, outer wall, inner wall, and Rosenthal's canal.

Authors:  A Kawano; H L Seldon; G M Clark
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  Measurements of electrode position inside the cochlea for different cochlear implant systems.

Authors:  Maria-Izabel Kós; Colette Boëx; Alain Sigrist; Jean-Philippe Guyot; Marco Pelizzone
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Histopathology of cochlear implants in humans.

Authors:  J B Nadol; J Y Shiao; B J Burgess; D R Ketten; D K Eddington; B J Gantz; I Kos; P Montandon; N J Coker; J T Roland; J K Shallop
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Psychoacoustic evaluation of present prostheses.

Authors:  R C Bilger
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1977 May-Jun

9.  Place and periodicity pitch by stimulation of multiple scala tympani electrodes in deaf volunteers.

Authors:  D K Eddington; W H Dobelle; D E Brackmann; M G Mladejovsky; J Parkin
Journal:  Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs       Date:  1978

10.  The importance of human cochlear anatomy for the results of modiolus-hugging multichannel cochlear implants.

Authors:  J H Frijns; J J Briaire; J J Grote
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  39 in total

1.  Monopolar intracochlear pulse trains selectively activate the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Matthew C Schoenecker; Ben H Bonham; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-22

2.  Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting.

Authors:  Walter Di Nardo; Alessandro Scorpecci; Sara Giannantonio; Francesca Cianfrone; Gaetano Paludetti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Implications of deep electrode insertion on cochlear implant fitting.

Authors:  Mathieu Gani; Gregory Valentini; Alain Sigrist; Maria-Izabel Kós; Colette Boëx
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-11

4.  Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Divya Sridhar; Ben H Bonham; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-21

5.  An electric frequency-to-place map for a cochlear implant patient with hearing in the nonimplanted ear.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Tony Spahr; Rene Gifford; Louise Loiselle; Sharon McKarns; Timothy Holden; Margaret Skinner; Charles Finley
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-03-10

6.  Considerations for design of future cochlear implant electrode arrays: electrode array stiffness, size, and depth of insertion.

Authors:  Stephen J Rebscher; Alexander Hetherington; Ben Bonham; Peter Wardrop; David Whinney; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

7.  Partial withdrawal of deeply inserted cochlear electrodes: observations of two patients.

Authors:  Maria-Izabel Kos; Colette Boex; Jean-Philippe Guyot; Marco Pelizzone
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Minimum Reporting Standards for Adult Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Oliver F Adunka; Bruce J Gantz; Camille Dunn; Richard K Gurgel; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Simulating the effects of spread of electric excitation on musical tuning and melody identification with a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Anthony J Spahr; Leonid M Litvak; Michael F Dorman; Ashley R Bohanan; Lakshmi N Mishra
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 10.  The Hybrid cochlear implant: a review.

Authors:  Erika A Woodson; Lina A J Reiss; Christopher W Turner; Kate Gfeller; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.