Literature DB >> 18178350

Psychophysical assessment of stimulation sites in auditory prosthesis electrode arrays.

Bryan E Pfingst1, Rose A Burkholder-Juhasz, Teresa A Zwolan, Li Xu.   

Abstract

Auditory prostheses use implanted electrode arrays that permit stimulation at many sites along the tonotopic axis of auditory neurons. Psychophysical studies demonstrate that measures of implant function, such as detection and discrimination thresholds, vary considerably across these sites, that the across-site patterns of these measures differ across subjects, and that the likely mechanisms underlying this variability differ across measures. Psychophysical and speech recognition studies suggest that not all stimulation sites contribute equally to perception with the prosthesis and that some sites might have negative effects on perception. Studies that reduce the number of active stimulation sites indicate that most cochlear implant users can effectively utilize a maximum of only about seven sites in their processors. These findings support a strategy for improving implant performance by selecting only the best stimulation sites for the processor map. Another approach is to revise stimulation parameters for ineffective sites in an effort to improve acuity at those sites. In this paper, we discuss data supporting these approaches and some potential pitfalls.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18178350      PMCID: PMC2593127          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  66 in total

1.  Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-09

2.  Psychophysical metrics and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Li Xu
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Effect of electrode configuration on psychophysical forward masking in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Bom Jun Kwon; Chris van den Honert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Implications of deep electrode insertion on cochlear implant fitting.

Authors:  Mathieu Gani; Gregory Valentini; Alain Sigrist; Maria-Izabel Kós; Colette Boëx
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-11

5.  Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Electromotile hearing: acoustic tones mask psychophysical response to high-frequency electrical stimulation of intact guinea pig cochleae.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Kohei Kawamoto; Yehoash Raphael; David F Dolan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spatially distinct functional output regions within the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus: implications for an auditory midbrain implant.

Authors:  Hubert H Lim; David J Anderson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition in noise.

Authors:  Li Xu; Yunfang Zheng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Multichannel cochlear implants: relation of histopathology to performance.

Authors:  Jose N Fayad; Fred H Linthicum
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Open set speech perception with auditory brainstem implant?

Authors:  Vittorio Colletti; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

2.  Effects of electrode configuration on cochlear implant modulation detection thresholds.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Imaging evaluation of electrode placement and effect on electrode discrimination on different cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Authors:  Ángel Ramos de Miguel; Andrea A Argudo; Silvia A Borkoski Barreiro; Juan Carlos Falcón González; Angel Ramos Macías
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Modeling the electrode-neuron interface of cochlear implants: effects of neural survival, electrode placement, and the partial tripolar configuration.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Steven M Bierer; Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effects of high-rate pulse trains on electrode discrimination in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Christina L Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

6.  Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future.

Authors:  Blake S Wilson; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 3.208

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.