Literature DB >> 17246096

The experimental assessment of fitness in Drosophila. I. Comparative measures of competitive reproductive success.

D S Haymer1, D L Hartl.   

Abstract

Strains of D. melanogaster, representing a range of genetic diversity, were systematically subjected to each of several techniques that have been devised to assess total or net fitness. All of these techniques operationally define fitness in terms of reproductive success under competitive conditions. For the set of strains tested, an excellent correlation was obtained between the competitive indices produced by two single-generation intraspecific competitions, despite fundamental differences in the strains used as competitive standards. The results of two interspecific tests were also correlated, but the intraspecific vs. interspecific test result comparisons ranged from highly significant to nonsignificant correlations. For the fitness estimates, the overall variances produced by the intraspecific tests were greater than those obtained in the interspecific competitions. No significant correlations were found between the results of a long-term (multi-generation) competitive assessment of fitness and any of the single-generation tests. Therefore, although all of these tests refer to a net parameter called "fitness", they are clearly not all measuring the same thing. Differences in the competitive interactions operative in each technique are suggested to account for these results.

Entities:  

Year:  1982        PMID: 17246096      PMCID: PMC1201951     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  4 in total

1.  X-chromosomal heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A N Wilton; J A Sved
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Fitness as a Measurable Character in Drosophila.

Authors:  G R Knight; A Robertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1957-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Mating preference and the direction of evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  T K Watanabe; M Kawanishi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Genetic variation and genetic load due to the male reproductive component of fitness in Drosophila.

Authors:  J G Brittnacher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.562

  4 in total
  11 in total

1.  The Experimental Assessment of Fitness in Drosophila. II. a Comparison of Competitive and Noncompetitive Measures.

Authors:  D S Haymer; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Reproductive fitness and artificial selection in animal breeding: culling on fitness prevents a decline in reproductive fitness in lines of Drosophila melanogaster selected for increased inebriation time.

Authors:  R Frankham; B H Yoo; B L Sheldon
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  The competitive ability and fitness components of the Methoprene-tolerant (Met) Drosophila mutant resistant to juvenile hormone analog insecticides.

Authors:  C Minkoff; T G Wilson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Measurement of Fitness and Its Components in Six Laboratory Strains of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  T Yamazaki
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genetic adaptation to captivity and inbreeding depression in small laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B D Latter; J C Mulley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Reduced genetic load revealed by slow inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B D Latter; J C Mulley; D Reid; L Pascoe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  A reevaluation of data from competitive tests shows high levels of heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B D Latter; J A Sved
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genetic variation for total fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K Fowler; C Semple; N H Barton; L Partridge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Effects of artificial stabilizing selection on Drosophila populations subjected to directional selection for another trait.

Authors:  A G Imasheva; L A Zhivotovsky; O E Lazebny
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Multiple vital functions of the daughterless (da) gene in Drosophila melanogaster and factors influencing its expression.

Authors:  W M Muir; A E Bell
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1987-05-15       Impact factor: 1.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.