Literature DB >> 7705628

Genetic adaptation to captivity and inbreeding depression in small laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

B D Latter1, J C Mulley.   

Abstract

The rate of adaptation to a competitive laboratory environment and the associated inbreeding depression in measures of reproductive fitness have been observed in populations of Drosophila melanogaster with mean effective breeding size of the order of 50 individuals. Two large wild-derived populations and a long-established laboratory cage population were used as base stocks, from which subpopulations were extracted and slowly inbred under crowded conditions over a period of 210 generations. Comparisons have been made of the competitive ability and reproductive fitness of these subpopulations, the panmictic populations produced from them by hybridization and random mating and the wild- or cage-base populations from which they were derived. After an average of approximately 180 generations in the laboratory, the wild-derived panmictic populations exceeded the resampled natural populations by 75% in fitness under competitive conditions. The cage-derived panmictic population, after a total of 17 years in the laboratory, showed a 90% superiority in competitive ability over the corresponding wild population. In the inbred lines derived from the wild-base stocks, the average rate of adaptation was estimated to be 0.33 +/- 0.06% per generation. However, the gain in competitive ability was more than offset by inbreeding depression at an initial rate of approximately 2% per generation. The effects of both adaptation and inbreeding on reproductive ability in a noncompetitive environment were found to be minor by comparison. The maintenance of captive populations under noncompetitive conditions can therefore be expected to minimize adaptive changes due to natural selection in the changed environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7705628      PMCID: PMC1206323     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  6 in total

1.  The experimental assessment of fitness in Drosophila. I. Comparative measures of competitive reproductive success.

Authors:  D S Haymer; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The Experimental Assessment of Fitness in Drosophila. II. a Comparison of Competitive and Noncompetitive Measures.

Authors:  D S Haymer; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Polymorphism and linkage for mannosephosphate isomerase in Mus musculus.

Authors:  E A Nichols; V M Chapman; F H Ruddle
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 1.890

4.  Evolution of fitness in experimental populations of Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  F J Ayala
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-11-12       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. IV. Genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila willistoni.

Authors:  F J Ayala; J R Powell; M L Tracey; C A Mourão; S Pérez-Salas
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Patterns of gene variation in central and marginal populations of Drosophila robusta.

Authors:  S Prakash
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 4.562

  6 in total
  13 in total

1.  Effect of selection against deleterious mutations on the decline in heterozygosity at neutral loci in closely inbreeding populations.

Authors:  J Wang; W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Reduced genetic load revealed by slow inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B D Latter; J C Mulley; D Reid; L Pascoe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genetic variation for total fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K Fowler; C Semple; N H Barton; L Partridge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Mutant alleles of small effect are primarily responsible for the loss of fitness with slow inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B D Latter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Detecting heterozygosity in shotgun genome assemblies: Lessons from obligately outcrossing nematodes.

Authors:  Antoine Barrière; Shiaw-Pyng Yang; Elizabeth Pekarek; Cristel G Thomas; Eric S Haag; Ilya Ruvinsky
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Effective population size and evolutionary dynamics in outbred laboratory populations of Drosophila.

Authors:  Laurence D Mueller; Amitabh Joshi; Marta Santos; Michael R Rose
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.166

7.  Role of pleiotropy in the evolution of a cryptic developmental variation in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Fabien Duveau; Marie-Anne Félix
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  A workflow to design new directed domestication programs to move forward current and future insect production.

Authors:  Thomas Lecocq; Lola Toomey
Journal:  Anim Front       Date:  2021-06-19

9.  Parallel trait adaptation across opposing thermal environments in experimental Drosophila melanogaster populations.

Authors:  Ray Tobler; Joachim Hermisson; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Effect of cage size on Aedes albopictus wing length, survival and egg production.

Authors:  Dubravka Pudar; Arianna Puggioli; Fabrizio Balestrino; Victoria Sy; Marco Carrieri; Romeo Bellini; Dušan Petrić
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.