Literature DB >> 17246139

The Experimental Assessment of Fitness in Drosophila. II. a Comparison of Competitive and Noncompetitive Measures.

D S Haymer1, D L Hartl.   

Abstract

Twelve diverse strains of Drosophila melanogaster have been examined with respect to their individual fitness components and with respect to their relative performance under competitive and noncompetitive conditions. Individual fitness components included estimates of time until successful copulation (t), fecundity (f) and egg-to-adult viability (v), and a composite index of overall fitness of the form fv/t was used for comparisons among strains. Noncompetitive performance was assessed in terms of the biomass (standing crop) and productivity of equilibrium experimental populations. Competitive performance was assessed in terms of relative competitive ability vis-à-vis a standard compound-autosome-bearing strain in single-generation tests. A significant correlation was found between the composite index of individual fitness components and the competitive compound-autosome test. Although the biomass and productivity of equilibrium populations were correlated with each other, neither of these noncompetitive measures was correlated with individual fitness components or with the composite index. We suggest that the performance of strains in such noncompetitive tests may be related to what Wright has called the "mean selective value" of the populations. Judging from their association with the composite index of individual fitness components, competitive tests such as the compound-autosome test seem to be related more nearly to the average Darwinian fitness of the populations.

Entities:  

Year:  1983        PMID: 17246139      PMCID: PMC1202080     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  1 in total

1.  The experimental assessment of fitness in Drosophila. I. Comparative measures of competitive reproductive success.

Authors:  D S Haymer; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 4.562

  1 in total
  8 in total

1.  Reproductive fitness and artificial selection in animal breeding: culling on fitness prevents a decline in reproductive fitness in lines of Drosophila melanogaster selected for increased inebriation time.

Authors:  R Frankham; B H Yoo; B L Sheldon
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: the causal relationship of bristle number to fitness.

Authors:  S V Nuzhdin; J D Fry; T F Mackay
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genetic adaptation to captivity and inbreeding depression in small laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B D Latter; J C Mulley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A reevaluation of data from competitive tests shows high levels of heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B D Latter; J A Sved
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Heterosis for viability, fecundity, and male fertility in Drosophila melanogaster: comparison of mutational and standing variation.

Authors:  J D Fry; S L Heinsohn; T F Mackay
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Multiple vital functions of the daughterless (da) gene in Drosophila melanogaster and factors influencing its expression.

Authors:  W M Muir; A E Bell
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1987-05-15       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 7.  Life-History Evolution and the Genetics of Fitness Components in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Thomas Flatt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Parallel trait adaptation across opposing thermal environments in experimental Drosophila melanogaster populations.

Authors:  Ray Tobler; Joachim Hermisson; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.694

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.