Literature DB >> 6795085

Genetic variation and genetic load due to the male reproductive component of fitness in Drosophila.

J G Brittnacher.   

Abstract

The genetic variation and genetic load due to virility, the male reproductive component of fitness, was measured in Drosophila melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura using males homozygous and heterozygous for the second chromosome of each species. Virility was determined in a female-choice, male mating competition experiment where both mating propensity and fertility were taken into account.--The mean virility of the homozygous D. melanogaster males relative to the heterozygous males was 0.50; the relative mean virility of the quasinormal homozygotes was 0.56. The mean virility of the homozygous D. pseudoobscura males relative to the heterozygous males was 0.70; the relative mean virility of the nonsterile homozygotes was 0.72, and of the quasinormal homozygotes, 0.68.--Depending on the species and chromosome sampled, fertile homozygous males had a mean virility 15 to 50% lower than the mean viability of individuals homozygous for a chromosome with quasinormal viability. The genetic load due to virility was also greater than that due to the female reproductive component. This higher level of hidden genetic variation (or genetic load) indicates that the results of Prout (1971a, b) and Bundgaard and Christian (1972), where the virility component of fitness dominated the dynamics of an artificial polymorphism, may be more general and that virility may dominate the dynamics of natural polymorphisms as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6795085      PMCID: PMC1214420     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  8 in total

1.  Genetics of natural populations. 32. Inbreeding and the mutational and balanced genetic loads in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  T DOBZHANSKY; B SPASSKY; T TIDWELL
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1963-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetics of Natural Populations. VIII. Concealed Variability in the Second and the Fourth Chromosomes of Drosophila Pseudoobscura and Its Bearing on the Problem of Heterosis.

Authors:  T Dobzhansky; A M Holz; B Spassky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1942-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A population cage test for heterosis in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  J A Sved; F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Evidence for selection by male mating success in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  W W Anderson; L Levine; O Olvera; J R Powell; M E de la Rosa; V M Salceda; M I Gaso; J Guzmán
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Dynamics of polymorphisms. I. Selection components in an experimental population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Bundgaard; F B Christiansen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  An estimate of heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Sved
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Homozygous viability and fertility loads in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R G Temin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genetic load in natural populations: is it compatible with the hypothesis that many polymorphisms are maintained by natural selection?

Authors:  M L Tracey; F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 4.562

  8 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild.

Authors:  H E Hoekstra; J M Hoekstra; D Berrigan; S N Vignieri; A Hoang; C E Hill; P Beerli; J G Kingsolver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Inbreeding reveals stronger net selection on Drosophila melanogaster males: implications for mutation load and the fitness of sexual females.

Authors:  M A Mallet; A K Chippindale
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Alloprocoptic selection: A mode of natural selection promoting polymorphism.

Authors:  J M Serradilla; F J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The experimental assessment of fitness in Drosophila. I. Comparative measures of competitive reproductive success.

Authors:  D S Haymer; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The aging effect on male mating activity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K Kosuda
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  A symmetric two-locus fertility model.

Authors:  M W Feldman; U Liberman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Lack of nucleotide polymorphism in the Y-linked sperm flagellar dynein gene Dhc-Yh3 of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  M Zurovcova; W F Eanes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A symmetric two locus model with viability and fertility selection.

Authors:  U Liberman; M W Feldman
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  Genetic variation for total fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K Fowler; C Semple; N H Barton; L Partridge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Heterosis for viability, fecundity, and male fertility in Drosophila melanogaster: comparison of mutational and standing variation.

Authors:  J D Fry; S L Heinsohn; T F Mackay
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.