Literature DB >> 1592245

The competitive ability and fitness components of the Methoprene-tolerant (Met) Drosophila mutant resistant to juvenile hormone analog insecticides.

C Minkoff1, T G Wilson.   

Abstract

The Methoprene-tolerant (Met) mutation of Drosophila melanogaster results in a high (100-fold) level of resistance to the insecticide methoprene, a chemical analog of juvenile hormone. Pest species that are under control with methoprene may therefore have the potential to evolve resistance via a mutation homologous to Met. To evaluate the potential of such mutants to persist in wild populations, we must understand the fitness of flies carrying Met. In the absence of methoprene, Met flies were outcompeted by a wild-type strain both in a multigeneration population cage and in single-generation competition experiments. To determine which fitness component(s) is responsible for the competitive disadvantage, the survival, time of development, and fecundity of flies homozygous for each of five Met alleles were compared with wild type. Small but significant differences were found between the pooled Met alleles and wild type for pupal development time, pupal mortality, and early adult fecundity. These differences result in a large competitive disadvantage. Although Met flies were found to have reduced fitness by these measures, the phenotype is not as severe as might be expected from a knowledge of the disruption of juvenile hormone regulation seen in Met flies. It is concluded that (1) although Met flies have a large advantage under methoprene selection, they will quickly become outcompeted upon relaxation of methoprene usage, (2) even a seemingly severe disruption of juvenile hormone regulation has no drastic effect on the vital functions of the insect and (3) small differences in fitness components can translate into a large competitive disadvantage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1592245      PMCID: PMC1204969     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  14 in total

1.  Evidence for a juvenile hormone receptor involved in protein synthesis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  L Shemshedini; M Lanoue; T G Wilson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1990-02-05       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  The experimental assessment of fitness in Drosophila. I. Comparative measures of competitive reproductive success.

Authors:  D S Haymer; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The Relation between Fitness Components and Population Prediction in Drosophila. I: The Estimation of Fitness Components.

Authors:  T Prout
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A Drosophila melanogaster mutant resistant to a chemical analog of juvenile hormone.

Authors:  T G Wilson; J Fabian
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  Third-generation pesticides.

Authors:  C M Williams
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 2.142

6.  The titre of juvenile hormone during the pupal and adult stages of the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M Bownes; H Rembold
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1987-05-04

Review 7.  Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations.

Authors:  M J Simmons; J F Crow
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 8.  Ecological genetics of insecticide and acaricide resistance.

Authors:  R T Roush; J A McKenzie
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 19.686

Review 9.  Hormonal and genetic regulation of vitellogenesis in Drosophila.

Authors:  M Bownes
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 4.875

10.  Effects of juvenile hormone mimics on larval development and metamorphosis of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  L M Riddiford; M Ashburner
Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.822

View more
  5 in total

1.  Wide mutational spectrum of a gene involved in hormone action and insecticide resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Thomas G Wilson; Shaoli Wang; Milan Beno; Robert Farkas
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 3.291

2.  Juvenile hormone resistance: ! no PASaran !

Authors:  R Feyereisen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Insecticide resistance resulting from an absence of target-site gene product.

Authors:  T G Wilson; M Ashok
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Pleiotropic Effects of DDT Resistance on Male Size and Behaviour.

Authors:  Wayne G Rostant; Jemima Bowyer; Jack Coupland; James Facey; David J Hosken; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  The effect of three environmental conditions on the fitness of cytochrome P450 monooxygenase-mediated permethrin resistance in Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus.

Authors:  Melissa C Hardstone; Brian P Lazzaro; Jeffrey G Scott
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.260

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.