Literature DB >> 7705630

Reduced genetic load revealed by slow inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster.

B D Latter1, J C Mulley, D Reid, L Pascoe.   

Abstract

The rate of decline in reproductive fitness in populations of Drosophila melanogaster inbred at an initial rate of approximately 1% per generation has been investigated under both competitive and noncompetitive conditions. Breeding population size was variable in the inbred lines with an estimated harmonic mean of 66.7 +/- 2.2. Of the 60 lines maintained without reserves, 75% survived a period of 210 generations of slow inbreeding and were then rapidly inbred by full-sib mating to near-homozygosity. The initial rate of inbreeding was estimated to be 0.96 +/- 0.16% per generation, corresponding to an effective population size of approximately 50. However, the rate of inbreeding declined significantly with time to average only 0.52 +/- 0.08% per generation over the 210 generation period, most likely due to associative overdominance built up by genetic sampling and selection in the small populations. The total inbreeding depression in fitness was estimated to be 87 +/- 3% for competitive ability and 27 +/- 5% for fitness under uncrowded conditions, corresponding to rates of decline of 2.0 +/- 0.3 and 0.32 +/- 0.07%, respectively, per 1% increase in the inbreeding coefficient. The frequency of lethal second chromosomes in the resultant near-homozygous lines was of the order of 5%, lethal free second chromosomes showed a mean viability under both crowded and uncrowded conditions of approximately 95%, and their population cage fitness was 60% that of Cy/+ heterozygotes. It can be concluded that homozygous genotypes from which deleterious genes of major effect have been eliminated during slow inbreeding may show far less depression in reproductive fitness than suggested by earlier studies of wild chromosome homozygotes. The loss in fitness due to homozygosity throughout the entire genome may be as little as 85-90% under competitive conditions, and 25-30% in an optimal environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7705630      PMCID: PMC1206325     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  12 in total

1.  X-chromosomal heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A N Wilton; J A Sved
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Selection for heterozygotes in small populations.

Authors:  A ROBERTSON
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The genetics of litter size in mice.

Authors:  D S FALCONER
Journal:  J Cell Comp Physiol       Date:  1960-11

4.  Studies in quantitative inheritance. IX. The effects of inbreeding at different rates in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A O TANTAWY; E C REEVE
Journal:  Z Indukt Abstamm Vererbungsl       Date:  1956

5.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1931-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The Relationship of Heterosis and Genetic Divergence in Maize.

Authors:  R H Moll; J H Lonnquist; J V Fortuno; E C Johnson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Fitness as a Measurable Character in Drosophila.

Authors:  G R Knight; A Robertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1957-07       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genetic adaptation to captivity and inbreeding depression in small laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B D Latter; J C Mulley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Fitness of third chromosome homozygotes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Sved
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Decline in heterozygosity under full-sib and double first-cousin inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  W Rumball; I R Franklin; R Frankham; B L Sheldon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  15 in total

1.  Effect of selection against deleterious mutations on the decline in heterozygosity at neutral loci in closely inbreeding populations.

Authors:  J Wang; W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  An inbreeding model of associative overdominance during a population bottleneck.

Authors:  N Bierne; A Tsitrone; P David
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Inbreeding of bottlenecked butterfly populations. Estimation using the likelihood of changes in marker allele frequencies.

Authors:  I J Saccheri; I J Wilson; R A Nichols; M W Bruford; P M Brakefield
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  The genetics of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth; John H Willis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Inbreeding depression and male survivorship in Drosophila: implications for senescence theory.

Authors:  William R Swindell; Juan L Bouzat
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genetic components of variation in Nemophila menziesii undergoing inbreeding: morphology and flowering time.

Authors:  R G Shaw; D L Byers; F H Shaw
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Demographic costs of inbreeding revealed by sex-specific genetic rescue effects.

Authors:  Susanne R K Zajitschek; Felix Zajitschek; Robert C Brooks
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Resolving the Conflict Between Associative Overdominance and Background Selection.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Inbreeding rate modifies the dynamics of genetic load in small populations.

Authors:  Nina Pekkala; K Emily Knott; Janne S Kotiaho; Mikael Puurtinen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Purging of inbreeding depression within the Irish Holstein-Friesian population.

Authors:  Sinéad Mc Parland; Francis Kearney; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.