Literature DB >> 9061969

Genetic variation for total fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.

K Fowler1, C Semple, N H Barton, L Partridge.   

Abstract

We measured the heterozygous effects on net fitness of a sample of 12 wild-type third chromosomes in D. melanogaster. Effects on fitness were assessed by competing the wild-type chromosomes against balancer chromosomes, to prevent the production of recombinants. The measurements were carried out in the population cage environment in which the life history had been evolving, in an undisturbed population with overlapping generations, and replicated measurements were made on each chromosome to control for confounding effects such as mutation accumulation. We found significant variation among the wild type chromosomes in their additive genetic effect on net fitness. The system provides an opportunity to obtain an accurate estimate of the distribution of heterozygous effects on net fitness, the contribution of different fitness components including male mating success, and the role of intra-chromosomal epistasis in fitness variation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9061969      PMCID: PMC1688253          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  16 in total

1.  The distribution of transposable elements within and between chromosomes in a population of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Element frequencies and distribution.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; A Lapid; D Canada
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 2.  Comparing mutational variabilities.

Authors:  D Houle; B Morikawa; M Lynch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations.

Authors:  M J Simmons; J F Crow
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 16.830

4.  Genetic adaptation to captivity and inbreeding depression in small laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B D Latter; J C Mulley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Accounting for bias in estimates of the rate of polygenic mutation.

Authors:  P D Keightley; T F Mackay; A Caballero
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1993-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Genotype-environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov; D Houle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1994-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  An experimental on recombination load in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; D Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Dynamics of polymorphisms. I. Selection components in an experimental population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Bundgaard; F B Christiansen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  An estimate of heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Sved
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Genetic variation and genetic load due to the male reproductive component of fitness in Drosophila.

Authors:  J G Brittnacher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  14 in total

1.  Genetic variation for total fitness in Drosophila melanogaster: complex yet replicable patterns.

Authors:  Michael P Gardner; Kevin Fowler; Nicholas H Barton; Linda Partridge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Heritability of fitness in a wild mammal population.

Authors:  L E Kruuk; T H Clutton-Brock; J Slate; J M Pemberton; S Brotherstone; F E Guinness
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Patterns of quantitative genetic variation in multiple dimensions.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-10       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 4.  Causes of natural variation in fitness: evidence from studies of Drosophila populations.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation.

Authors:  Jonathan R Gibson; Adam K Chippindale; William R Rice
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Quantitative trait loci for maternal performance for offspring survival in mice.

Authors:  Andréa C Peripato; Reinaldo A De Brito; Ty T Vaughn; L Susan Pletscher; Sergio R Matioli; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genotype-environment interaction for total fitness in Drosophila.

Authors:  James D Fry
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 8.  Quantitative genetic study of the adaptive process.

Authors:  R G Shaw; F H Shaw
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Understanding and using quantitative genetic variation.

Authors:  William G Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  Life-History Evolution and the Genetics of Fitness Components in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Thomas Flatt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.