Literature DB >> 8070661

A reevaluation of data from competitive tests shows high levels of heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster.

B D Latter1, J A Sved.   

Abstract

We have analyzed the results from a range of procedures designed to measure the fitness under competitive conditions of inbred strains of Drosophila melanogaster, specifically strains which are homozygous for chromosome 2. All methods show a substantial reduction in fitness, ranging from an estimated 70-80% for single generation competition tests to 80-90% for a multiple generation population cage procedure. Furthermore, inbreeding through brother-sister mating reduces fitness by a comparable amount when allowance is made for the expected degree of homozygosity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8070661      PMCID: PMC1205973     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  9 in total

1.  X-chromosomal heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A N Wilton; J A Sved
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Relative fitness of genetically open and closed experimental populations of Drosophila robusta.

Authors:  H L CARSON
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1961-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The experimental assessment of fitness in Drosophila. I. Comparative measures of competitive reproductive success.

Authors:  D S Haymer; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The Experimental Assessment of Fitness in Drosophila. II. a Comparison of Competitive and Noncompetitive Measures.

Authors:  D S Haymer; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Fitness as a Measurable Character in Drosophila.

Authors:  G R Knight; A Robertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1957-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Competitive fitness in experimental populations of Drosophila willistoni.

Authors:  C A Mourão; F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  A population cage test for heterosis in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  J A Sved; F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Fitness of third chromosome homozygotes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Sved
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  An estimate of heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Sved
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 1.588

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Environment dependence of mutational parameters for viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  James D Fry; Stefanie L Heinsohn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Inbreeding depression and male survivorship in Drosophila: implications for senescence theory.

Authors:  William R Swindell; Juan L Bouzat
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Causes of natural variation in fitness: evidence from studies of Drosophila populations.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Heterosis for viability, fecundity, and male fertility in Drosophila melanogaster: comparison of mutational and standing variation.

Authors:  J D Fry; S L Heinsohn; T F Mackay
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Mutant alleles of small effect are primarily responsible for the loss of fitness with slow inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B D Latter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genetic effects on mating success and partner choice in a social mammal.

Authors:  Jenny Tung; Marie J E Charpentier; Sayan Mukherjee; Jeanne Altmann; Susan C Alberts
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice.

Authors:  S Meagher; D J Penn; W K Potts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Life-History Evolution and the Genetics of Fitness Components in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Thomas Flatt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Head-to-head comparison of three experimental methods of quantifying competitive fitness in C. elegans.

Authors:  Timothy A Crombie; Sayran Saber; Ayush Shekhar Saxena; Robyn Egan; Charles F Baer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.