Literature DB >> 17242873

Cervical spine disc prosthesis: radiographic, biomechanical and morphological post mortal findings 12 weeks after implantation. A retrieval example.

Tobias Pitzen1, Annette Kettler, Joerg Drumm, Abdullah Nabhan, Wolf Ingo Steudel, Lutz Claes, Hans Joachim Wilke.   

Abstract

There is a gap between in vitro and clinical studies concerning performance of spinal disc prosthesis. Retrieval studies may help to bridge this gap by providing more detailed information about motion characteristics, wear properties and osseous integration. Here, we report on the radiographic, mechanical, histological properties of a cervical spine segment treated with a cervical spine disc prosthesis (Prodisc C, Synthes Spine, Paoli, USA) for 3 months. A 48-year-old male received the device due to symptomatic degenerative disc disease within C5-C6. The patient recovered completely from his symptoms. Twelve weeks later, he died from a subarachnoid hemorrhage. During routine autopsy, C3-T1 was removed with all attached muscles and ligaments and subjected to plain X-rays and computed tomography, three dimensional flexibility tests, shear test as well as histological and electronic microscopic investigations. We detected radiolucencies mainly at the cranial interface between bone and implant. The flexibility of the segment under pure bending moments of +/-2.5 Nm applied in flexion/extension, axial rotation and lateral bending was preserved, with, however, reduced lateral bending and enlarged neutral zone compared to the adjacent segments C4-C5, and C6-C7. Stepwise increase of loading in flexion/extension up to +/-9.5 Nm did not result in segmental destruction. A postero-anterior force of 146 N was necessary to detach the lower half of the prosthesis from the vertebra. At the polyethylene (PE) core, signs of wear were observed compared to an unused core using electronic microscopy. Metal and PE debris without signs of severe inflammatory reaction was found within the surrounding soft tissue shell of the segment. A thin layer of soft connective tissue covered the major part of the implant endplate. Despite the limits of such a case report, the results show: that such implants are able to preserve at least a certain degree of segmental flexibility, that direct bone implant contact is probably rare, and that debris may be found after 12 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17242873      PMCID: PMC2219652          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0312-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  14 in total

1.  Pullout test with three lumbar interbody fusion cages.

Authors:  Rupert H J Dietl; Matthias Krammer; Annette Kettler; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Lutz Claes; Christianto B Lumenta
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Screw fixation to the posterior cortical shell does not influence peak torque and pullout in anterior cervical plating.

Authors:  T Pitzen; D Barbier; F Tintinger; W I Steudel; M Strowitzki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-07-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis.

Authors:  A S Hilibrand; G D Carlson; M A Palumbo; P K Jones; H H Bohlman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Insertion torque and pullout force of rescue screws for anterior cervical plate fixation in a fatigued initial pilot hole.

Authors:  Tobias Pitzen; Frederick Franta; Dragos Barbier; Wolf-Ingo Steudel
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2004-09

5.  In vitro biomechanics of cervical disc arthroplasty with the ProDisc-C total disc implant.

Authors:  Denis J DiAngelo; Kevin T Foley; Brian R Morrow; John S Schwab; Jung Song; John W German; Eve Blair
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 4.047

6.  Multidirectional flexibility analysis of cervical artificial disc reconstruction: in vitro human cadaveric spine model.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Kotani; Bryan W Cunningham; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Anton E Dmitriev; Manabu Ito; Niabin Hu; Yasuo Shikinami; Paul C McAfee; Akio Minami
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-02

7.  Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study.

Authors:  James T Robertson; Stephen M Papadopoulos; Vincent C Traynelis
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-12

8.  A universal spine tester for in vitro experiments with muscle force simulation.

Authors:  H J Wilke; L Claes; H Schmitt; S Wolf
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: single-level and bi-level.

Authors:  Jan Goffin; Frank Van Calenbergh; Johannes van Loon; Adrian Casey; Pierre Kehr; Klaus Liebig; Bengt Lind; Carlo Logroscino; Rosella Sgrambiglia; Vincent Pointillart
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The Bryan Cervical Disc: wear properties and early clinical results.

Authors:  Paul A Anderson; Rick C Sasso; Jeffrey P Rouleau; Cathy S Carlson; Jan Goffin
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Cervical and lumbar spinal arthroplasty: clinical review.

Authors:  T D Uschold; D Fusco; R Germain; L M Tumialan; S W Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  The use of self-mating PEEK as an alternative bearing material for cervical disc arthroplasty: a comparison of different simulator inputs and tribological environments.

Authors:  Tim Brown; Qi-Bin Bao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Disc herniation caused by a viscoelastic nucleus after total lumbar disc replacement-a case report.

Authors:  Lukas Grassner; Andreas Grillhösl; Michael Bierschneider; Martin Strowitzki
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

Review 4.  [Degenerative cervical spine diseases: fusion vs. total disc replacement : What can be done when?]

Authors:  T Pitzen; J Drumm; C Berthold; G Ostrowski; U Heiler; M Ruf
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Effect of an artificial disc on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Anke Mann; Thomas Zander; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A systematic review of cervical artificial disc replacement wear characteristics and durability.

Authors:  Ronald Lehman; Adam J Bevevino; Devon D Brewer; Andrea C Skelly; Paul A Anderson
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2012-02

7.  Wear pattern observations from TDR retrievals using autoregistration of voxel data.

Authors:  Yakov P Shkolnikov; Anton Bowden; Daniel MacDonald; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  A comparison of the shock-absorbing properties of cervical disc prosthesis bearing materials.

Authors:  Michael C Dahl; Stephen Jacobsen; Newton Metcalf; Rick Sasso; Randal P Ching
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2011-06-01

9.  Interaction of micron and nano-sized particles with cells of the dura mater.

Authors:  Iraklis Papageorgiou; Rainy Marsh; Joanne L Tipper; Richard M Hall; John Fisher; Eileen Ingham
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.368

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.