Literature DB >> 16381202

Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study.

James T Robertson1, Stephen M Papadopoulos, Vincent C Traynelis.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The authors compared the incidence of radiologically documented changes and symptomatic adjacent-level cervical disc disease after single-level discectomy and subsequent cervical fusion or arthroplasty in two independent prospective clinical studies.
METHODS: The patients were treated with the Affinity Anterior Cervical Cage System or the Bryan Artificial Cervical Disc. In each study the patients were required to undergo serial cervical radiography preoperatively and 24 months postoperatively, as well as serial clinical evaluations including documentation of adverse events, neurological status, and results of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey. All serial radiographs were reviewed prior to evaluating the clinical symptoms for development of increasing or new adjacent degenerative disc disease (DDD). Subsequently, the clinical data were analyzed. For various reasons of exclusion, the cases analyzed in the Bryan disc-treated cohort consisted of 74 patients and in the Affinity system-treated cohort there were 158 patients. New anterior osteophyte formation or enlargement, increased narrowing of an interspace, new DDD, and calcification of the anterior longitudinal ligament were the radiological findings indicative of adjacent-level disease. Fusion was associated with a significant increase in x-ray film-based changes of adjacent-disc disease (p = 0.009, odds ratio [OR] 2.44). In the cage fusion series, the incidence of symptomatic adjacent-level DDD was statistically greater than that in the group treated with the artificial disc (p = 0.018), and the patients required a statistically greater number of medical treatments related to episodic symptoms of neck, shoulder, and arm pain attributed to new disc disease (p = 0.001, OR 35.8).
CONCLUSIONS: In comparing these prospective studies the authors demonstrated that maintaining motion rather than fusion will prevent symptomatic adjacent-disc disease and will decrease adjacent-level radiological indicators of disease at a 24-month postoperative interval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16381202     DOI: 10.3171/spi.2005.3.6.0417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  93 in total

Review 1.  Prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Xinwei Wang; Wanshan Bai; Xiaolong Shen; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Tri-level surgical treatment of cervical spinal cord compression in a Thoroughbred yearling.

Authors:  Nick Huggons
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.

Authors:  Seok Woo Kim; Marc Anthony Limson; Soo-Bum Kim; Jose Joefrey F Arbatin; Kee-Young Chang; Moon-Soo Park; Jae-hyuk Shin; Yeong-Su Ju
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Motion analysis of single-level cervical total disc arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Shun-wu Fan; Xin-wei Wang; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.071

5.  Cervical total disc replacement C5/6.

Authors:  Petr Suchomel; Pavel Barsa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Cervical canal stenosis and adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical arthrodesis.

Authors:  Jing Tao Zhang; Jun Ming Cao; Fan Tao Meng; Yong Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Long Term Societal Costs of Anterior Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA) for Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy.

Authors:  Ahmer Ghori; Joseph F Konopka; Heeren Makanji; Thomas D Cha; Christopher M Bono
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-01-07

8.  Assessment of adjacent-segment mobility after cervical disc replacement versus fusion: RCT with 1 year's results.

Authors:  A Nabhan; B Ishak; W I Steudel; S Ramadhan; O Steimer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Hybrid surgery of multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease : review of literature and clinical results.

Authors:  Sang-Bok Lee; Kyoung-Suok Cho; Jong-Youn Kim; Do-Sung Yoo; Tae-Gyu Lee; Pil-Woo Huh
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-11-30

10.  What are the associative factors of adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical spine surgery? Comparative study between anterior cervical fusion and arthroplasty with 5-year follow-up MRI and CT.

Authors:  Jeong Yoon Park; Kyung Hyun Kim; Sung Uk Kuh; Dong Kyu Chin; Keun Su Kim; Yong Eun Cho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.