Literature DB >> 12384759

Screw fixation to the posterior cortical shell does not influence peak torque and pullout in anterior cervical plating.

T Pitzen1, D Barbier, F Tintinger, W I Steudel, M Strowitzki.   

Abstract

There is no consensus over whether screw fixation for anterior cervical plating should include the posterior cortical shell of the vertebral bodies or not. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the function of the posterior cortical shell with respect to maximal screw torque and pullout force. Twenty-four fresh frozen human cervical vertebrae coming from six spinal segments C4-C7 were used. They were scanned for bone mineral density (BMD) and then assigned to two groups with comparable bone density and segmental distribution. The posterior longitudinal ligament was resected carefully and two parallel burr holes were drilled into each vertebral body. The posterior cortical shell was removed in one burr hole, using a 6-mm steel burr, producing a shallow excavation with a depth of approximately 2 mm. An ABC screw was inserted into each burr hole. The screw to be inserted into the hole with the posterior excavation was called "monocortical". In contrast, the contralateral screw was called "bicortical". Peak torque was measured in one group, while pullout force was analyzed using the specimens of the second group. Mean value and standard deviation were calculated for peak torque and pullout force with respect to the type of fixation. A paired t-test was used to determine the effect of fixation type on peak torque and pullout force. Pearson moment correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the effect of BMD on peak torque and pullout force with respect to whether the screw was "mono- or bicortical". A 95% level of significance was used for all tests. No significant differences for peak torque and pullout force could be found comparing monocortical and bicortical screw fixation. However, for both monocortical and bicortical screw fixation, a positive correlation was seen for peak torque versus BMD and for pullout force versus bone mineral density, respectively. The importance of the posterior cortical shell for screw pullout force and screw peak torque seems to be negligible. In constrast, BMD greatly influences both peak torque and pullout force for both types of fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12384759      PMCID: PMC3611321          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-002-0447-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  13 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of anterior cervical spine plate fixation systems with unicortical and bicortical screw purchase.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lehmann; Michael Blauth; Daniel Briem; Ulf Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine locked and unlocked plate-fixation systems.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lehmann; Daniel Briem; Michael Blauth; Ulf Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Factors affecting the interface of cervical spine facet screws placed in the technique by Roy-Camille et al.

Authors:  T R Pitzen; S Zenner; D Barbier; T Georg; W I Steudel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Experimental in vivo acute and chronic biomechanical and histomorphometrical comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws.

Authors:  Maximiliano Aguiar Porto; Patrícia Silva; Rodrigo Rosa; José Batista Volpon; Antônio Carlos Shimano; Francisco José Albuquerque de Paula; Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Pullout strength of anterior spinal instrumentation: a product comparison of seven screws in calf vertebral bodies.

Authors:  Konrad Seller; Dieter Wahl; Alexander Wild; Rüdiger Krauspe; Erich Schneider; Berend Linke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Cervical anterior transpedicular screw fixation (ATPS)--Part II. Accuracy of manual insertion and pull-out strength of ATPS.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Frank Acosta; Mark Tauber; Michael Fox; Hudelmaier Martin; Rosmarie Forstner; Peter Augat; Rainer Penzkofer; Christian Pirich; H Kässmann; Herbert Resch; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Cervical spine disc prosthesis: radiographic, biomechanical and morphological post mortal findings 12 weeks after implantation. A retrieval example.

Authors:  Tobias Pitzen; Annette Kettler; Joerg Drumm; Abdullah Nabhan; Wolf Ingo Steudel; Lutz Claes; Hans Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Cement-augmented screws in a cervical two-level corpectomy with anterior titanium mesh cage reconstruction: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Sebastian Hartmann; Claudius Thomé; Anja Tschugg; Johannes Paesold; Pujan Kavakebi; Werner Schmölz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Expert's comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled "Surgical challenges in the management of cervical kyphotic deformity in patients with severe osteoporosis: an illustrative case of a patient with Hajdu-Cheney syndrome" (T. A. Mattei, A. A. Rehman, A. Issawi, D. R. Fassett).

Authors:  Luca Papavero
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  In vitro study of accuracy of cervical pedicle screw insertion using an electronic conductivity device (ATPS part III).

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Wolfgang Hitzl; Frank Acosta; Mark Tauber; Juliane Zenner; Herbert Resch; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Oliver Meier; Rene Schmidt; Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.