Literature DB >> 15541681

The Bryan Cervical Disc: wear properties and early clinical results.

Paul A Anderson1, Rick C Sasso, Jeffrey P Rouleau, Cathy S Carlson, Jan Goffin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The rationale for motion preservation by disc replacement after anterior cervical discectomy is to diminish long-term morbidity secondary to adjacent segment degeneration. However, these disc prostheses will be subject to wear and its possible adverse consequences.
PURPOSE: Assess the in vitro and in vivo wear properties of the Bryan Cervical Disc and the early clinical results. STUDY
DESIGN: In vitro mechanical testing, caprine animal model and prospective European human trial. OUTCOME MEASURE: In vitro mechanical testing used American Society for Testing and Materials standards to measure wear rates and debris. Caprine results were analyzed by histopathologic analysis by a blinded veterinary pathologist. Clinical outcomes were measured by Odoms's criteria, independent radiologic analysis and Short Form-36.
METHODS: In vitro wear testing in cervical spine simulator for up to 40 M cycles. Wear rates were determined and particles analyzed microscopically. The in vivo inflammatory response was studied in goats that had discectomy at C4-C5. They were sacrificed between 3 and 12 months and histopathologically were compared with controls who had fusions with titanium plates. A prospective clinical trial of 136 patients with minimum 1-year follow-up was analyzed using validated questionnaires and radiographs.
RESULTS: In vitro wear averaged approximately 1.76% by weight at 10 M cycles and 18% at 40 M cycles. Wear debris were present in the periprosthetic tissues in 4 of 11 animals without inflammatory response. The early clinical results were satisfactory in over 90% of patients.
CONCLUSION: The in vivo and in vitro wear properties are satisfactory for the expected duration of life of the prosthesis. The early clinical results are satisfactory and equal to fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15541681     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  24 in total

Review 1.  Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?

Authors:  Alberto Di Martino; Rocco Papalia; Erika Albo; Leonardo Cortesi; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Disc replacement using Pro-Disc C versus fusion: a prospective randomised and controlled radiographic and clinical study.

Authors:  A Nabhan; F Ahlhelm; T Pitzen; W I Steudel; J Jung; K Shariat; O Steimer; F Bachelier; D Pape
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Cervical disc prostheses].

Authors:  E W Fritsch; T Pitzen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Fusion versus Bryan Cervical Disc in two-level cervical disc disease: a prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  Lei Cheng; Lin Nie; Li Zhang; Yong Hou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Biomechanical effects of cervical arthroplasty with U-shaped disc implant on segmental range of motion and loading of surrounding soft tissue.

Authors:  Zhong Jun Mo; Yan Bin Zhao; Li Zhen Wang; Yu Sun; Ming Zhang; Yu Bo Fan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Surgical outcome of cervical arthroplasty using bryan(r).

Authors:  Hong-Ki Kim; Myung-Hyun Kim; Do-Sang Cho; Sung-Hak Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-12-31

7.  Clinical and radiographic reports following cervical arthroplasty: a 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Yan Cai Yang; Lin Nie; Lei Cheng; Yong Hou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Core herniation after implantation of a cervical artificial disc: case report.

Authors:  Christopher Brenke; Kirsten Schmieder; Martin Barth
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The Latest Lessons Learned from Retrieval Analyses of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, and Alternative Bearing Total Disc Replacements.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Jeffrey M Toth; Ryan Siskey; Lauren Ciccarelli; Dan Macdonald; Jorge Isaza; Todd Lanman; Ilona Punt; Marla Steinbeck; Jan Goffin; André van Ooij
Journal:  Semin Spine Surg       Date:  2012-03-01

10.  A comparison of outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion in everyday clinical practice: surgical and methodological aspects.

Authors:  Dieter Grob; Francois Porchet; Frank S Kleinstück; Friederike Lattig; Dezsoe Jeszenszky; Andrea Luca; Urs Mutter; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.