Literature DB >> 15636563

In vitro biomechanics of cervical disc arthroplasty with the ProDisc-C total disc implant.

Denis J DiAngelo1, Kevin T Foley, Brian R Morrow, John S Schwab, Jung Song, John W German, Eve Blair.   

Abstract

An in vitro biomechanical study was conducted to compare the effects of disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical fusion on cervical spine biomechanics in a multilevel human cadaveric model. Three spine conditions were studied: harvested, single-level cervical disc arthroplasty, and single-level fusion. A programmable testing apparatus was used that replicated physiological flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Measurements included vertebral motion, applied load, and bending moments. Relative rotations at the superior, treated, and inferior motion segment units (MSUs) were normalized with respect to the overall rotation of those three MSUs and compared using a one-way analysis of variance with Student-Newman-Keuls test (p < 0.05). Simulated fusion decreased motion across the treated site relative to the harvested and disc arthroplasty conditions. The reduced motion at the treated site was compensated at the adjacent segments by an increase in motion. For all modes of testing, use of an artificial disc prosthesis did not alter the motion patterns at either the instrumented level or adjacent segments compared with the harvested condition, except in extension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15636563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  32 in total

Review 1.  Cervical and lumbar spinal arthroplasty: clinical review.

Authors:  T D Uschold; D Fusco; R Germain; L M Tumialan; S W Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System® (TFAS®): loading as compared to a rigid posterior instrumentation system.

Authors:  Simon G Sjovold; Qingan Zhu; Anton Bowden; Chad R Larson; Peter M de Bakker; Marta L Villarraga; Jorge A Ochoa; David M Rosler; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  In vitro investigation of a new dynamic cervical implant: comparison to spinal fusion and total disc replacement.

Authors:  Bastian Welke; Michael Schwarze; Christof Hurschler; Thorsten Book; Stephan Magdu; Dorothea Daentzer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Assessment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifact Following Cervical Total Disc Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Amir H Fayyazi; Jennifer Taormina; David Svach; Jeff Stein; Nathaniel R Ordway
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-14

5.  Disc replacement using Pro-Disc C versus fusion: a prospective randomised and controlled radiographic and clinical study.

Authors:  A Nabhan; F Ahlhelm; T Pitzen; W I Steudel; J Jung; K Shariat; O Steimer; F Bachelier; D Pape
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Biomechanical effects of cervical arthroplasty with U-shaped disc implant on segmental range of motion and loading of surrounding soft tissue.

Authors:  Zhong Jun Mo; Yan Bin Zhao; Li Zhen Wang; Yu Sun; Ming Zhang; Yu Bo Fan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Cervical canal stenosis and adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical arthrodesis.

Authors:  Jing Tao Zhang; Jun Ming Cao; Fan Tao Meng; Yong Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Local and global subaxial cervical spine biomechanics after single-level fusion or cervical arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael A Finn; Darrel S Brodke; Michael Daubs; Alpesh Patel; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Operated and adjacent segment motions for fusion versus cervical arthroplasty: a pilot study.

Authors:  Tomoya Terai; Ahmad Faizan; Koichi Sairyo; Vijay K Goel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Cervical disc replacement - emerging equivalency to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Aaron J Buckland; Joseph F Baker; Ryan P Roach; Jeffrey M Spivak
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.