Literature DB >> 30069548

Disc herniation caused by a viscoelastic nucleus after total lumbar disc replacement-a case report.

Lukas Grassner1,2,3,4, Andreas Grillhösl5, Michael Bierschneider1, Martin Strowitzki1.   

Abstract

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is highly prevalent. If conservative treatment fails, spinal fusion procedures are commonly performed. Total disc replacement (TDR) might be a surgical option for a distinct subset of patients with DDD. Several prostheses have been or are still available. Despite some promising initial clinical results, there is still limited experience with hardware-related adverse events. This report highlights an unreported complication after TDR with a viscoelastic device. Literature about long-term outcome and safety of this particular TDR is scarce. Hence, there exists limited experience with TDR-related complications with such a failure mode. We report a 34-year-old male presented to us with an acute S1 radiculopathy on the right. His past medical history was significant for prior TDR at the level L5/S1 at another hospital 2 years prior to this acute episode. Imaging studies revealed an intraspinal mass compromising the right S1 nerve root. This mass mimicked a disc herniation and sequestrectomy was performed. Intraoperatively, the prolapsed sequester turned out to be part of the viscoelastic nucleus of the disc prosthesis. Interbody fusion combined with posterior instrumentation was ultimately performed. The patient did well afterwards, but is currently (2 years later) developing adjacent segment disease with facet syndromes. Since TDR might be beneficial for certain patients, spine surgeons should be aware of potential device-related complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Spine surgery; complication; fusion; outcome; total disc replacement (TDR)

Year:  2018        PMID: 30069548      PMCID: PMC6046337          DOI: 10.21037/jss.2018.05.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  24 in total

1.  Lumbar disc degeneration and sagittal flexibility.

Authors:  A K Burton; M C Battié; L Gibbons; T Videman; K M Tillotson
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1996-10

2.  Current trends in spinal arthroplasty: an assessment of surgeon practices and attitudes regarding cervical and lumbar disk replacement.

Authors:  Peter G Whang; Andrew K Simpson; Glenn Rechtine; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2009-02

Review 3.  Total disc replacement for chronic discogenic low back pain: a Cochrane review.

Authors:  Wilco C H Jacobs; Niels A van der Gaag; Moyo C Kruyt; Alexander Tuschel; Marinus de Kleuver; Wilco C Peul; Abraham J Verbout; F Cumhur Oner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Effect of axial load on the flexural properties of an elastomeric total disc replacement.

Authors:  Aziza Mahomed; Parshia M Moghadas; Duncan E T Shepherd; David W L Hukins; Amy Roome; Scott Johnson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Lumbar total disc replacement: does it still need further follow-up?

Authors:  Chun-Kun Park
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

6.  Cervical spine disc prosthesis: radiographic, biomechanical and morphological post mortal findings 12 weeks after implantation. A retrieval example.

Authors:  Tobias Pitzen; Annette Kettler; Joerg Drumm; Abdullah Nabhan; Wolf Ingo Steudel; Lutz Claes; Hans Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study.

Authors:  S L Weinhoffer; R D Guyer; M Herbert; S L Griffith
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Disc degeneration affects the multidirectional flexibility of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  M Mimura; M M Panjabi; T R Oxland; J J Crisco; I Yamamoto; A Vasavada
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Do lumbar motion preserving devices reduce the risk of adjacent segment pathology compared with fusion surgery? A systematic review.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Wang; Paul M Arnold; Jeffrey T Hermsmeyer; Daniel C Norvell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Clinical experience and two-year follow-up with a one-piece viscoelastic cervical total disc replacement.

Authors:  Kingsley Richard Chin; Jacob Ryan Lubinski; Kari Bracher Zimmers; Barry Eugene Sands; Fabio Pencle
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.