Literature DB >> 15739532

Multidirectional flexibility analysis of cervical artificial disc reconstruction: in vitro human cadaveric spine model.

Yoshihisa Kotani1, Bryan W Cunningham, Kuniyoshi Abumi, Anton E Dmitriev, Manabu Ito, Niabin Hu, Yasuo Shikinami, Paul C McAfee, Akio Minami.   

Abstract

OBJECT: This in vitro experimental study was conducted to investigate the initial biomechanical effect of artificial intervertebral disc replacement in the cervical spine. The multidirectional flexibility of replaced and adjacent spinal segments were analyzed using a cadaveric cervical spine model.
METHODS: The following three cervical reconstructions were sequentially performed at the C5-6 level after anterior discectomy in seven human cadaveric occipitocervical spines: anterior artificial disc replacement with a bioactive three-dimensional (3D) fabric disc (FD); anterior iliac bone graft; and anterior plate fixation with iliac bone graft. Six unconstrained pure moments were applied with a 6-df spine simulator, and 3D segmental motions at the operative and adjacent segments were measured with an optoelectronic motion measurement system. The 3D FD group demonstrated statistically equivalent ranges of motion (ROMs) when compared with intact values in axial rotation and lateral bending. The 45% increase in flexion-extension ROM was demonstrated in 3D FD group; however, neutral zone analysis did not reach statistical significance between the intact spine and 3D FD. The anterior iliac bone graft and iliac bone graft reconstructions demonstrated statistically lower ROMs when compared with 3D FD in all loading modes (p < 0.05). The adjacent-level ROMs of the 3D FD group demonstrated nearly physiological characteristics at upper and lower adjacent levels. Excellent stability at the interface was maintained during the whole testing without any device displacement and dislodgment.
CONCLUSIONS: The stand-alone cervical 3D FD demonstrated nearly physiological biomechanical characteristics at both operative and adjacent spinal segments in vitro, indicating an excellent clinical potential for cervical artificial disc replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15739532     DOI: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.2.0188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  6 in total

1.  The implantation of non-cell-based materials to prevent the recurrent disc herniation: an in vivo porcine model using quantitative discomanometry examination.

Authors:  Yao-Hung Wang; Tzong-Fu Kuo; Jaw-Lin Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical effects of cervical arthroplasty with U-shaped disc implant on segmental range of motion and loading of surrounding soft tissue.

Authors:  Zhong Jun Mo; Yan Bin Zhao; Li Zhen Wang; Yu Sun; Ming Zhang; Yu Bo Fan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  StabilimaxNZ) versus simulated fusion: evaluation of adjacent-level effects.

Authors:  Manohar M Panjabi; Gweneth Henderson; Yue James; Jens Peter Timm
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Cervical spine disc prosthesis: radiographic, biomechanical and morphological post mortal findings 12 weeks after implantation. A retrieval example.

Authors:  Tobias Pitzen; Annette Kettler; Joerg Drumm; Abdullah Nabhan; Wolf Ingo Steudel; Lutz Claes; Hans Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Primary and coupled motions after cervical total disc replacement using a compressible six-degree-of-freedom prosthesis.

Authors:  A G Patwardhan; M N Tzermiadianos; P P Tsitsopoulos; L I Voronov; S M Renner; M L Reo; G Carandang; K Ritter-Lang; R M Havey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  In vitro-analysis of kinematics and intradiscal pressures in cervical arthroplasty versus fusion--A biomechanical study in a sheep model with two semi-constrained prosthesis.

Authors:  Dorothea Daentzer; Bastian Welke; Christof Hurschler; Nathalie Husmann; Christina Jansen; Christian Heinrich Flamme; Berna Ida Richter
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.819

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.