Literature DB >> 19043744

Effect of an artificial disc on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study.

Antonius Rohlmann1, Anke Mann, Thomas Zander, Georg Bergmann.   

Abstract

The effects of different parameters on the mechanical behaviour of the lumbar spine were in most cases determined deterministically with only one uncertain parameter varied at a time while the others were kept fixed. Thus most parameter combinations were disregarded. The aim of the study was to determine in a probabilistic finite element study how intervertebral rotation, intradiscal pressure, and contact force in the facet joints are affected by the input parameters implant position, implant ball radius, presence of scar tissue, and gap size in the facet joints. An osseoligamentous finite element model of the lumbar spine ranging from L3 vertebra to L5/S1 intervertebral disc was used. An artificial disc with a fixed center of rotation was inserted at level L4/L5. The model was loaded with pure moments of 7.5 Nm to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion. In a probabilistic study the implant position in anterior-posterior (ap) and in lateral direction, the radius of the implant ball, and the gap size of the facet joint were varied. After implanting an artificial disc, scar tissue may develop, replacing the anterior longitudinal ligament. Thus presence and absence of scar tissue were also simulated. For each loading case studied, intervertebral rotations, intradiscal pressures and contact forces in the facet joints were calculated for 1,000 randomized input parameter combinations in order to determine the probable range of these output parameters. Intervertebral rotation at implant level varies strongly for different combinations of the input parameters. It is mainly affected by gap size, ap-position and implant ball radius for flexion, by scar tissue and implant ball radius for extension and lateral bending, and by gap size and implant ball radius for axial torsion. For extension, intervertebral rotation at implant level varied between 1.4 degrees and 7.5 degrees . Intradiscal pressure in the adjacent discs is only slightly affected by all input parameters. Contact forces in the facet joints at implant level vary strongly for the different combinations of the input parameters. For flexion, forces are 0 in 63% of the cases, but for small gap sizes and large implant ball radii they reach values of up to 533 N. Similar results are found for extension with a maximum predicted force of 560 N. Here the forces are mainly influenced by gap size, implant ball radius and scar tissue. The forces vary between 0 and 300 N for lateral bending and between 0 and 200 N for axial torsion. The parameters that have the greatest effect in both loading cases are the same as those for extension. Intervertebral rotation and contact force in the facet joints depend strongly on the input parameters studied. The probabilistic study shows a large variation of the results and likelihood of certain values. Clinical studies will be required to show whether or not there is a strong correlation of parameter combinations that cause high facet joint forces and low back pain after total disc replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19043744      PMCID: PMC2615124          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0836-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  23 in total

1.  Influence of a follower load on intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A Rohlmann; S Neller; L Claes; G Bergmann; H J Wilke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results.

Authors:  H M Mayer; K Wiechert; A Korge; I Qose
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-08-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Statistical methods in finite element analysis.

Authors:  Fazilat H Dar; Judith R Meakin; Richard M Aspden
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Effect of position and height of a mobile core type artificial disc on the biomechanical behaviour of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A Rohlmann; T Zander; B Bock; G Bergmann
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.617

5.  Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants.

Authors:  H J Wilke; K Wenger; L Claes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc.

Authors:  A P Dooris; V K Goel; N M Grosland; L G Gilbertson; D G Wilder
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Mechanical response of a lumbar motion segment in axial torque alone and combined with compression.

Authors:  A Shirazi-Adl; A M Ahmed; S C Shrivastava
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Articular facets of the human spine. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; T Oxland; K Takata; V Goel; J Duranceau; M Krag
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The effects of side-posture positioning and spinal adjusting on the lumbar Z joints: a randomized controlled trial with sixty-four subjects.

Authors:  Gregory D Cramer; Douglas M Gregerson; J Todd Knudsen; Bradley B Hubbard; Leah M Ustas; Joe A Cantu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability.

Authors:  M Sharma; N A Langrana; J Rodriguez
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  18 in total

1.  Parameters influencing the outcome after total disc replacement at the lumbosacral junction. Part 1: misalignment of the vertebrae adjacent to a total disc replacement affects the facet joint and facet capsule forces in a probabilistic finite element analysis.

Authors:  A Rohlmann; S Lauterborn; M Dreischarf; H Schmidt; M Putzier; P Strube; T Zander
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The effect of different design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty on the range of motion, facet joint forces and instantaneous center of rotation of a L4-5 segment.

Authors:  Hendrik Schmidt; Stefan Midderhoff; Kyle Adkins; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  In silico evaluation of a new composite disc substitute with a L3-L5 lumbar spine finite element model.

Authors:  Jérôme Noailly; Luigi Ambrosio; K Elizabeth Tanner; Josep A Planell; Damien Lacroix
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Computer simulation and image guidance for individualised dynamic spinal stabilization.

Authors:  S R Kantelhardt; U Hausen; M Kosterhon; A N Amr; K Gruber; A Giese
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on spine kinematics and facet joint loads in flexion and extension: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Hendrik Schmidt; Fabio Galbusera; Antonius Rohlmann; Thomas Zander; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Validation and prediction of traditional Chinese physical operation on spinal disease using multiple deformation models.

Authors:  Lei Pan; Xubo Yang; Lixu Gu; Wenlong Lu; Min Fang
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 7.  Spinal facet joint biomechanics and mechanotransduction in normal, injury and degenerative conditions.

Authors:  Nicolas V Jaumard; William C Welch; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Dynamic biomechanical examination of the lumbar spine with implanted total disc replacement using a pendulum testing system.

Authors:  Alan H Daniels; David J Paller; Sarath Koruprolu; Matthew McDonnell; Mark A Palumbo; Joseph J Crisco
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

10.  Validation of Pre-operative Templating for Total Disc Replacement Surgery.

Authors:  Justin F M Hollenbeck; Jill A Fattor; Vikas Patel; Evalina Burger; Paul J Rullkoetter; Christopher M J Cain
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.