Literature DB >> 17148422

Inferring the distribution of mutational effects on fitness in Drosophila.

Laurence Loewe1, Brian Charlesworth.   

Abstract

The properties of the distribution of deleterious mutational effects on fitness (DDME) are of fundamental importance for evolutionary genetics. Since it is extremely difficult to determine the nature of this distribution, several methods using various assumptions about the DDME have been developed, for the purpose of parameter estimation. We apply a newly developed method to DNA sequence polymorphism data from two Drosophila species and compare estimates of the parameters of the distribution of the heterozygous fitness effects of amino acid mutations for several different distribution functions. The results exclude normal and gamma distributions, since these predict too few effectively lethal mutations and power-law distributions as a result of predicting too many lethals. Only the lognormal distribution appears to fit both the diversity data and the frequency of lethals. This DDME arises naturally in complex systems when independent factors contribute multiplicatively to an increase in fitness-reducing damage. Several important parameters, such as the fraction of effectively neutral non-synonymous mutations and the harmonic mean of non-neutral selection coefficients, are robust to the form of the DDME. Our results suggest that the majority of non-synonymous mutations in Drosophila are under effective purifying selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17148422      PMCID: PMC1686194          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  17 in total

1.  A P-element insertion screen identified mutations in 455 novel essential genes in Drosophila.

Authors:  Su-Wan Oh; Tracy Kingsley; Hyun-hee Shin; Zhiyu Zheng; Hua-Wei Chen; Xiu Chen; Hong Wang; Peizheng Ruan; Michelle Moody; Steven X Hou
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Estimating the distribution of selection coefficients from phylogenetic data with applications to mitochondrial and viral DNA.

Authors:  Rasmus Nielsen; Ziheng Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  From gene families and genera to incomes and internet file sizes: why power laws are so common in nature.

Authors:  William J Reed; Barry D Hughes
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2002-12-20

4.  Estimating the distribution of fitness effects from DNA sequence data: implications for the molecular clock.

Authors:  Gwenaël Piganeau; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Estimates of the genomic mutation rate for detrimental alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth; Helen Borthwick; Carolina Bartolomé; Patricia Pignatelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Estimating selection on nonsynonymous mutations.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; Brian Charlesworth; Carolina Bartolomé; Véronique Nöel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The logarithm in biology. II. Distributions simulating the log-normal.

Authors:  A L Koch
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  The Kavar(D) dominant female-sterile mutations of Drosophila reveal a role for the maternally provided alpha-tubulin4 isoform in cleavage spindle maintenance and elongation.

Authors:  Zsolt Venkei; János Szabad
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 3.291

9.  The importin-beta P446L dominant-negative mutant protein loses RanGTP binding ability and blocks the formation of intact nuclear envelope.

Authors:  Gyula Timinszky; László Tirián; Ferenc T Nagy; Gábor Tóth; András Perczel; Zsuzsanna Kiss-László; Imre Boros; Paul R Clarke; János Szabad
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 10.  Annotation of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatic genome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sima Misra; Madeline A Crosby; Christopher J Mungall; Beverley B Matthews; Kathryn S Campbell; Pavel Hradecky; Yanmei Huang; Joshua S Kaminker; Gillian H Millburn; Simon E Prochnik; Christopher D Smith; Jonathan L Tupy; Eleanor J Whitfied; Leyla Bayraktaroglu; Benjamin P Berman; Brian R Bettencourt; Susan E Celniker; Aubrey D N J de Grey; Rachel A Drysdale; Nomi L Harris; John Richter; Susan Russo; Andrew J Schroeder; Sheng Qiang Shu; Mark Stapleton; Chihiro Yamada; Michael Ashburner; William M Gelbart; Gerald M Rubin; Suzanna E Lewis
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-12-31       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  49 in total

1.  Quantifying the variation in the effective population size within a genome.

Authors:  Toni I Gossmann; Megan Woolfit; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetic linkage and natural selection.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Mutation and the evolution of recombination.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The population genetics of mutations: good, bad and indifferent.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; William G Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  What can we learn about the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations from DNA sequence data?

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The effects of demography and linkage on the estimation of selection and mutation parameters.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Are there ergodic limits to evolution? Ergodic exploration of genome space and convergence.

Authors:  Tom C B McLeish
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 8.  The repatterning of eukaryotic genomes by random genetic drift.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Louis-Marie Bobay; Francesco Catania; Jean-François Gout; Mina Rho
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 8.929

9.  The other side of the nearly neutral theory, evidence of slightly advantageous back-mutations.

Authors:  Jane Charlesworth; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Mutational interference and the progression of Muller's ratchet when mutations have a broad range of deleterious effects.

Authors:  R Jonas Söderberg; Otto G Berg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.