Literature DB >> 26640648

Are there ergodic limits to evolution? Ergodic exploration of genome space and convergence.

Tom C B McLeish1.   

Abstract

We examine the analogy between evolutionary dynamics and statistical mechanics to include the fundamental question of ergodicity-the representative exploration of the space of possible states (in the case of evolution this is genome space). Several properties of evolutionary dynamics are identified that allow a generalization of the ergodic dynamics, familiar in dynamical systems theory, to evolution. Two classes of evolved biological structure then arise, differentiated by the qualitative duration of their evolutionary time scales. The first class has an ergodicity time scale (the time required for representative genome exploration) longer than available evolutionary time, and has incompletely explored the genotypic and phenotypic space of its possibilities. This case generates no expectation of convergence to an optimal phenotype or possibility of its prediction. The second, more interesting, class exhibits an evolutionary form of ergodicity-essentially all of the structural space within the constraints of slower evolutionary variables have been sampled; the ergodicity time scale for the system evolution is less than the evolutionary time. In this case, some convergence towards similar optima may be expected for equivalent systems in different species where both possess ergodic evolutionary dynamics. When the fitness maximum is set by physical, rather than co-evolved, constraints, it is additionally possible to make predictions of some properties of the evolved structures and systems. We propose four structures that emerge from evolution within genotypes whose fitness is induced from their phenotypes. Together, these result in an exponential speeding up of evolution, when compared with complete exploration of genomic space. We illustrate a possible case of application and a prediction of convergence together with attaining a physical fitness optimum in the case of invertebrate compound eye resolution.

Keywords:  ergodicity; evolution; genotype; phenotype; statistical mechanics

Year:  2015        PMID: 26640648      PMCID: PMC4633858          DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2015.0041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interface Focus        ISSN: 2042-8898            Impact factor:   3.906


  25 in total

Review 1.  Genetic and developmental mechanisms underlying the formation of the Drosophila compound eye.

Authors:  Maria Tsachaki; Simon G Sprecher
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.780

2.  Statistical mechanics and the evolution of polygenic quantitative traits.

Authors:  N H Barton; H P de Vladar
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  On the application of statistical physics to evolutionary biology.

Authors:  N H Barton; J B Coe
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  New fossil Stylops (Strepsiptera: Stylopidae) from Dominican amber.

Authors:  Marcos Kogan; George Poinar
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.434

Review 5.  The protein folding problem.

Authors:  Ken A Dill; S Banu Ozkan; M Scott Shell; Thomas R Weikl
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 12.981

6.  A dynamical model of ommatidial crystal formation.

Authors:  David K Lubensky; Matthew W Pennington; Boris I Shraiman; Nicholas E Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  EGF receptor and Notch signaling act upstream of Eyeless/Pax6 to control eye specification.

Authors:  J P Kumar; K Moses
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-03-09       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Epistasis--the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems.

Authors:  Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Drosophila atonal controls photoreceptor R8-specific properties and modulates both receptor tyrosine kinase and Hedgehog signalling.

Authors:  N M White; A P Jarman
Journal:  Development       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 10.  The loci of evolution: how predictable is genetic evolution?

Authors:  David L Stern; Virginie Orgogozo
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  4 in total

1.  Distribution of genotype network sizes in sequence-to-structure genotype-phenotype maps.

Authors:  Susanna Manrubia; José A Cuesta
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Gaia as Solaris: An Alternative Default Evolutionary Trajectory.

Authors:  Srdja Janković; Ana Katić; Milan M Ćirković
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 1.120

3.  Toward a theory of evolution as multilevel learning.

Authors:  Vitaly Vanchurin; Yuri I Wolf; Mikhail I Katsnelson; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Replaying the tape of life in the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Virginie Orgogozo
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.