Literature DB >> 21954163

Quantifying the variation in the effective population size within a genome.

Toni I Gossmann1, Megan Woolfit, Adam Eyre-Walker.   

Abstract

The effective population size (N(e)) is one of the most fundamental parameters in population genetics. It is thought to vary across the genome as a consequence of differences in the rate of recombination and the density of selected sites due to the processes of genetic hitchhiking and background selection. Although it is known that there is intragenomic variation in the effective population size in some species, it is not known whether this is widespread or how much variation in the effective population size there is. Here, we test whether the effective population size varies across the genome, between protein-coding genes, in 10 eukaryotic species by considering whether there is significant variation in neutral diversity, taking into account differences in the mutation rate between loci by using the divergence between species. In most species we find significant evidence of variation. We investigate whether the variation in N(e) is correlated to recombination rate and the density of selected sites in four species, for which these data are available. We find that N(e) is positively correlated to recombination rate in one species, Drosophila melanogaster, and negatively correlated to a measure of the density of selected sites in two others, humans and Arabidopsis thaliana. However, much of the variation remains unexplained. We use a hierarchical Bayesian analysis to quantify the amount of variation in the effective population size and show that it is quite modest in all species-most genes have an N(e) that is within a few fold of all other genes. Nonetheless we show that this modest variation in N(e) is sufficient to cause significant differences in the efficiency of natural selection across the genome, by demonstrating that the ratio of the number of nonsynonymous to synonymous polymorphisms is significantly correlated to synonymous diversity and estimates of N(e), even taking into account the obvious nonindependence between these measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21954163      PMCID: PMC3241429          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.132654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  94 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of synonymous codon usage in metazoans.

Authors:  Laurent Duret
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.578

2.  Combining probability from independent tests: the weighted Z-method is superior to Fisher's approach.

Authors:  M C Whitlock
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  Fast accumulation of nonsynonymous mutations on the female-specific W chromosome in birds.

Authors:  Sofia Berlin; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Model of effectively neutral mutations in which selective constraint is incorporated.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Studying patterns of recent evolution at synonymous sites and intronic sites in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Population genomics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus: Quantifying the life cycle.

Authors:  Isheng J Tsai; Douda Bensasson; Austin Burt; Vassiliki Koufopanou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Evidence for variation in the effective population size of animal mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  Gwenael Piganeau; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation.

Authors:  Jonathan K Pritchard; Joseph K Pickrell; Graham Coop
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  44 in total

Review 1.  Making sense of genomic islands of differentiation in light of speciation.

Authors:  Jochen B W Wolf; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Estimation of the ancestral effective population sizes of African great apes under different selection regimes.

Authors:  Carlos G Schrago
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  One size fits all? Direct evidence for the heterogeneity of genetic drift throughout the genome.

Authors:  Belén Jiménez-Mena; Paula Tataru; Rasmus F Brøndum; Goutam Sahana; Bernt Guldbrandtsen; Thomas Bataillon
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  Prediction and estimation of effective population size.

Authors:  J Wang; E Santiago; A Caballero
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 5.  Determinants of genetic diversity.

Authors:  Hans Ellegren; Nicolas Galtier
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Joint Prediction of the Effective Population Size and the Rate of Fixation of Deleterious Mutations.

Authors:  Enrique Santiago; Armando Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Chromatin organization is a major influence on regional mutation rates in human cancer cells.

Authors:  Benjamin Schuster-Böckler; Ben Lehner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  More accurate phylogenies inferred from low-recombination regions in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting.

Authors:  James B Pease; Matthew W Hahn
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Identifying loci under selection against gene flow in isolation-with-migration models.

Authors:  Vitor C Sousa; Miguel Carneiro; Nuno Ferrand; Jody Hey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Mining the pig genome to investigate the domestication process.

Authors:  S E Ramos-Onsins; W Burgos-Paz; A Manunza; M Amills
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.