Literature DB >> 20923980

The effects of demography and linkage on the estimation of selection and mutation parameters.

Kai Zeng1, Brian Charlesworth.   

Abstract

We explore the effects of demography and linkage on a maximum-likelihood (ML) method for estimating selection and mutation parameters in a reversible mutation model. This method assumes free recombination between sites and a randomly mating population of constant size and uses information from both polymorphic and monomorphic sites in the sample. Two likelihood-ratio test statistics were constructed under this ML framework: LRTγ for detecting selection and LRTκ for detecting mutational bias. By carrying out extensive simulations, we obtain the following results. When mutations are neutral and population size is constant, LRTγ and LRTκ follow a chi-square distribution with 1 d.f. regardless of the level of linkage, as long as the mutation rate is not very high. In addition, LRTγ and LRTκ are relatively insensitive to demographic effects and selection at linked sites. We find that the ML estimators of the selection and mutation parameters are usually approximately unbiased and that LRTκ usually has good power to detect mutational bias. Finally, with a recombination rate that is typical for Drosophila, LRTγ has good power to detect weak selection acting on synonymous sites. These results suggest that the method should be useful under many different circumstances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20923980      PMCID: PMC2998320          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.122150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  74 in total

1.  Directional selection and the site-frequency spectrum.

Authors:  C D Bustamante; J Wakeley; S Sawyer; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Effect of misoriented sites on neutrality tests with outgroup.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Baudry; Frantz Depaulis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Estimating recombination rates from population-genetic data.

Authors:  Michael P H Stumpf; Gilean A T McVean
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Statistical tests for detecting positive selection by utilizing high-frequency variants.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Yun-Xin Fu; Suhua Shi; Chung-I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Studying patterns of recent evolution at synonymous sites and intronic sites in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 6.  Genetic recombination and molecular evolution.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; A J Betancourt; V B Kaiser; I Gordo
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2009-09-04

7.  Ancestral inference from samples of DNA sequences with recombination.

Authors:  R C Griffiths; P Marjoram
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.479

8.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  16 in total

1.  The Effects of Background and Interference Selection on Patterns of Genetic Variation in Subdivided Populations.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Pádraic Corcoran
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The joint effects of background selection and genetic recombination on local gene genealogies.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Charlesworth et al. on Background Selection and Neutral Diversity.

Authors:  Stephen I Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The Effect of Strong Purifying Selection on Genetic Diversity.

Authors:  Ivana Cvijović; Benjamin H Good; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Toward an Evolutionarily Appropriate Null Model: Jointly Inferring Demography and Purifying Selection.

Authors:  Parul Johri; Brian Charlesworth; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Detection of Regional Variation in Selection Intensity within Protein-Coding Genes Using DNA Sequence Polymorphism and Divergence.

Authors:  Zi-Ming Zhao; Michael C Campbell; Ning Li; Daniel S W Lee; Zhang Zhang; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  The importance of the Neutral Theory in 1968 and 50 years on: A response to Kern and Hahn 2018.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Jensen; Bret A Payseur; Wolfgang Stephan; Charles F Aquadro; Michael Lynch; Deborah Charlesworth; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Rates and genomic consequences of spontaneous mutational events in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Daniel R Schrider; David Houle; Michael Lynch; Matthew W Hahn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  The effects of deleterious mutations on evolution at linked sites.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Codon usage bias and effective population sizes on the X chromosome versus the autosomes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jose L Campos; Kai Zeng; Darren J Parker; Brian Charlesworth; Penelope R Haddrill
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.