Literature DB >> 20308090

The population genetics of mutations: good, bad and indifferent.

Laurence Loewe1, William G Hill.   

Abstract

Population genetics is fundamental to our understanding of evolution, and mutations are essential raw materials for evolution. In this introduction to more detailed papers that follow, we aim to provide an oversight of the field. We review current knowledge on mutation rates and their harmful and beneficial effects on fitness and then consider theories that predict the fate of individual mutations or the consequences of mutation accumulation for quantitative traits. Many advances in the past built on models that treat the evolution of mutations at each DNA site independently, neglecting linkage of sites on chromosomes and interactions of effects between sites (epistasis). We review work that addresses these limitations, to predict how mutations interfere with each other. An understanding of the population genetics of mutations of individual loci and of traits affected by many loci helps in addressing many fundamental and applied questions: for example, how do organisms adapt to changing environments, how did sex evolve, which DNA sequences are medically important, why do we age, which genetic processes can generate new species or drive endangered species to extinction, and how should policy on levels of potentially harmful mutagens introduced into the environment by humans be determined?

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20308090      PMCID: PMC2871823          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  116 in total

Review 1.  Terumi Mukai and the riddle of deleterious mutation rates.

Authors:  P D Keightley; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  The degeneration of Y chromosomes.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; D Charlesworth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The degeneration of asexual haploid populations and the speed of Muller's ratchet.

Authors:  I Gordo; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation.

Authors:  G A McVean; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Prediction of deleterious human alleles.

Authors:  S Sunyaev; V Ramensky; I Koch; W Lathe; A S Kondrashov; P Bork
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  On the speed of Muller's ratchet.

Authors:  I Gordo; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Fisher, Medawar, Hamilton and the evolution of aging.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Is Wright's shifting balance process important in evolution?

Authors:  J A Coyne; N H Barton; M Turelli
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Selection intensity against deleterious mutations in RNA secondary structures and rate of compensatory nucleotide substitutions.

Authors:  H Innan; W Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Evolution by small steps and rugged landscapes in the RNA virus phi6.

Authors:  C L Burch; L Chao
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  57 in total

Review 1.  The fuel of evolution.

Authors:  C López-Fanjul; A García-Dorado
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 2.  Beneficial mutations and the dynamics of adaptation in asexual populations.

Authors:  Paul D Sniegowski; Philip J Gerrish
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A quantitative test of population genetics using spatiogenetic patterns in bacterial colonies.

Authors:  Kirill S Korolev; João B Xavier; David R Nelson; Kevin R Foster
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Determining the factors driving selective effects of new nonsynonymous mutations.

Authors:  Christian D Huber; Bernard Y Kim; Clare D Marsden; Kirk E Lohmueller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Lazy Updating of hubs can enable more realistic models by speeding up stochastic simulations.

Authors:  Kurt Ehlert; Laurence Loewe
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  The Impact of Genomic and Traditional Selection on the Contribution of Mutational Variance to Long-Term Selection Response and Genetic Variance.

Authors:  Herman A Mulder; Sang Hong Lee; Sam Clark; Ben J Hayes; Julius H J van der Werf
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Direct and indirect effects of chemical contaminants on the behaviour, ecology and evolution of wildlife.

Authors:  Minna Saaristo; Tomas Brodin; Sigal Balshine; Michael G Bertram; Bryan W Brooks; Sean M Ehlman; Erin S McCallum; Andrew Sih; Josefin Sundin; Bob B M Wong; Kathryn E Arnold
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  De novo mutations in human genetic disease.

Authors:  Joris A Veltman; Han G Brunner
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Chronology in lesion tolerance gives priority to genetic variability.

Authors:  Karel Naiman; Gaëlle Philippin; Robert P Fuchs; Vincent Pagès
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Molecular Origins of Complex Heritability in Natural Genotype-to-Phenotype Relationships.

Authors:  Christopher M Jakobson; Daniel F Jarosz
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 10.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.