Literature DB >> 15238530

Estimates of the genomic mutation rate for detrimental alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.

Brian Charlesworth1, Helen Borthwick, Carolina Bartolomé, Patricia Pignatelli.   

Abstract

The net rate of mutation to deleterious but nonlethal alleles and the sizes of effects of these mutations are of great significance for many evolutionary questions. Here we describe three replicate experiments in which mutations have been accumulated on chromosome 3 of Drosophila melanogaster by means of single-male backcrosses of heterozygotes for a wild-type third chromosome. Egg-to-adult viability was assayed for nonlethal homozygous chromosomes. The rates of decline in mean and increase in variance (DM and DV, respectively) were estimated. Scaled up to the diploid whole genome, the mean DM for homozygous detrimental mutations over the three experiments was between 0.8 and 1.8%. The corresponding DV estimate was approximately 0.11%. Overall, the results suggest a lower bound estimate of at least 12% for the diploid per genome mutation rate for detrimentals. The upper bound estimates for the mean selection coefficient were between 2 and 10%, depending on the method used. Mutations with selection coefficients of at least a few percent must be the major contributors to the effects detected here and are likely to be caused mostly by transposable element insertions or indels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15238530      PMCID: PMC1470907          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.103.025262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  31 in total

Review 1.  Terumi Mukai and the riddle of deleterious mutation rates.

Authors:  P D Keightley; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  High frequency of cryptic deleterious mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  E K Davies; A D Peters; P D Keightley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-09-10       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex.

Authors:  P D Keightley; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Rates of movement of transposable elements on the second chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  X Maside; S Assimacopoulos; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  On the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious spontaneous mutations.

Authors:  A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T F Mackay; R F Lyman; M S Jackson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Quantitative genetic analysis of copia retrotransposon activity in inbred Drosophila melanogaster lines.

Authors:  S V Nuzhdin; E G Pasyukova; E A Morozova; A J Flavell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Rapid decline of fitness in panmictic populations of Drosophila melanogaster maintained under relaxed natural selection.

Authors:  S A Shabalina; A S Kondrashov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The effect of cryopreservation on the lethal mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D Houle; A S Kondrashov; L Y Yampolsky; S Caldwell; P L Steponkus
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M D Adams; S E Celniker; R A Holt; C A Evans; J D Gocayne; P G Amanatides; S E Scherer; P W Li; R A Hoskins; R F Galle; R A George; S E Lewis; S Richards; M Ashburner; S N Henderson; G G Sutton; J R Wortman; M D Yandell; Q Zhang; L X Chen; R C Brandon; Y H Rogers; R G Blazej; M Champe; B D Pfeiffer; K H Wan; C Doyle; E G Baxter; G Helt; C R Nelson; G L Gabor; J F Abril; A Agbayani; H J An; C Andrews-Pfannkoch; D Baldwin; R M Ballew; A Basu; J Baxendale; L Bayraktaroglu; E M Beasley; K Y Beeson; P V Benos; B P Berman; D Bhandari; S Bolshakov; D Borkova; M R Botchan; J Bouck; P Brokstein; P Brottier; K C Burtis; D A Busam; H Butler; E Cadieu; A Center; I Chandra; J M Cherry; S Cawley; C Dahlke; L B Davenport; P Davies; B de Pablos; A Delcher; Z Deng; A D Mays; I Dew; S M Dietz; K Dodson; L E Doup; M Downes; S Dugan-Rocha; B C Dunkov; P Dunn; K J Durbin; C C Evangelista; C Ferraz; S Ferriera; W Fleischmann; C Fosler; A E Gabrielian; N S Garg; W M Gelbart; K Glasser; A Glodek; F Gong; J H Gorrell; Z Gu; P Guan; M Harris; N L Harris; D Harvey; T J Heiman; J R Hernandez; J Houck; D Hostin; K A Houston; T J Howland; M H Wei; C Ibegwam; M Jalali; F Kalush; G H Karpen; Z Ke; J A Kennison; K A Ketchum; B E Kimmel; C D Kodira; C Kraft; S Kravitz; D Kulp; Z Lai; P Lasko; Y Lei; A A Levitsky; J Li; Z Li; Y Liang; X Lin; X Liu; B Mattei; T C McIntosh; M P McLeod; D McPherson; G Merkulov; N V Milshina; C Mobarry; J Morris; A Moshrefi; S M Mount; M Moy; B Murphy; L Murphy; D M Muzny; D L Nelson; D R Nelson; K A Nelson; K Nixon; D R Nusskern; J M Pacleb; M Palazzolo; G S Pittman; S Pan; J Pollard; V Puri; M G Reese; K Reinert; K Remington; R D Saunders; F Scheeler; H Shen; B C Shue; I Sidén-Kiamos; M Simpson; M P Skupski; T Smith; E Spier; A C Spradling; M Stapleton; R Strong; E Sun; R Svirskas; C Tector; R Turner; E Venter; A H Wang; X Wang; Z Y Wang; D A Wassarman; G M Weinstock; J Weissenbach; S M Williams; K C Worley; D Wu; S Yang; Q A Yao; J Ye; R F Yeh; J S Zaveri; M Zhan; G Zhang; Q Zhao; L Zheng; X H Zheng; F N Zhong; W Zhong; X Zhou; S Zhu; X Zhu; H O Smith; R A Gibbs; E W Myers; G M Rubin; J C Venter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-24       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Measurements of spontaneous rates of mutations in the recent past and the near future.

Authors:  Fyodor A Kondrashov; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The population genetics of mutations: good, bad and indifferent.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; William G Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The first steps of transposable elements invasion: parasitic strategy vs. genetic drift.

Authors:  Arnaud Le Rouzic; Pierre Capy
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Estimating selection on nonsynonymous mutations.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; Brian Charlesworth; Carolina Bartolomé; Véronique Nöel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genomic mutation in lines of Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to ultraviolet-B radiation.

Authors:  Joanna L MacKenzie; Fabienne E Saadé; Quang Hien Le; Thomas E Bureau; Daniel J Schoen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The effect of antagonistic pleiotropy on the estimation of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.

Authors:  B Fernández; A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  A map of the human genome in linkage disequilibrium units.

Authors:  W Tapper; A Collins; J Gibson; N Maniatis; S Ennis; N E Morton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Inferring the distribution of mutational effects on fitness in Drosophila.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Deleterious genomic mutation rate for viability in Drosophila melanogaster using concomitant sibling controls.

Authors:  Yi Gong; R C Woodruff; J N Thompson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Low impact of germline transposition on the rate of mildly deleterious mutation in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Mattieu Bégin; Daniel J Schoen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.