Literature DB >> 17102964

Increased intra-abdominal pressure affects respiratory variations in arterial pressure in normovolaemic and hypovolaemic mechanically ventilated healthy pigs.

Serge Duperret1, Franck Lhuillier, Vincent Piriou, Emmanuel Vivier, Olivier Metton, Patricia Branche, Guy Annat, Karim Bendjelid, Jean Paul Viale.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) on the systolic and pulse pressure variations induced by positive pressure ventilation in a porcine model. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Experimental study in a research laboratory.
SUBJECTS: Seven mechanically ventilated and instrumented pigs prone to normovolaemia and hypovolaemia by blood withdrawal. INTERVENTION: Abdominal banding gradually increased IAP in 5-mmHg steps up to 30 mmHg.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Variations in systolic pressure, pulse pressure, inferior vena cava flow, and pleural and transmural (LVEDPtm) left-ventricular end-diastolic pressure were recorded at each step. Systolic pressure variations were 6.1+/-3.1%, 8.5+/-3.6% and 16.0+/-5.0% at 0, 10, and 30 mmHg IAP in normovolaemic animals (mean+/-SD; p<0.01 for IAP effect). They were 12.7+/-4.6%, 13.4+/-6.7%, and 23.4+/-6.3% in hypovolaemic animals (p<0.01 vs normovolaemic group) for the same IAP. Fluctuations of the inferior vena cava flow disappeared as the IAP increased. Breath cycle did not induce any variations of LVEDPtm for 0 and 30 mmHg IAP.
CONCLUSIONS: In this model, the systolic pressure and pulse pressure variations, and inferior vena cava flow fluctuations were dependent on IAP values which caused changes in pleural pressure swing, and this dependency was more marked during hypovolaemia. The present study suggests that dynamic indices are not exclusively related to volaemia in the presence of increased IAP. However, their fluid responsiveness predictive value could not be ascertained as no fluid challenge was performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17102964     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-006-0412-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  19 in total

Review 1.  Clinical usefulness of respiratory variations in arterial pressure.

Authors:  Sheldon Magder
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Influence of tidal volume on stroke volume variation. Does it really matter?

Authors:  Frédéric Michard; Jean-Louis Teboul; Christian Richard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-08-02       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Effects of abdominal pressure on venous return: abdominal vascular zone conditions.

Authors:  M Takata; R A Wise; J L Robotham
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1990-12

4.  Hemodynamic effects of intermittent positive pressure respiration.

Authors:  B C Morgan; W E Martin; T F Hornbein; E W Crawford; W G Guntheroth
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1966 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Systolic blood pressure variation is a sensitive indicator of hypovolemia in ventilated dogs subjected to graded hemorrhage.

Authors:  A Perel; R Pizov; S Cotev
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Sarah Heenen; Michael Piagnerelli; Marc Koch; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Daniel A Reuter; Julian Bayerlein; Matthias S G Goepfert; Florian C Weis; Erich Kilger; Peter Lamm; Alwin E Goetz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension.

Authors:  B Tavernier; O Makhotine; G Lebuffe; J Dupont; P Scherpereel
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  A comparison of systolic blood pressure variations and echocardiographic estimates of end-diastolic left ventricular size in patients after aortic surgery.

Authors:  P Coriat; M Vrillon; A Perel; J F Baron; F Le Bret; M Saada; P Viars
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients.

Authors:  Christophe Barbier; Yann Loubières; Christophe Schmit; Jan Hayon; Jean-Louis Ricôme; François Jardin; Antoine Vieillard-Baron
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 17.440

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Mateo Aboy; Christoph K Hofer; Mohamed Rehman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  It's time to measure intra-abdominal pressure to optimize hemodynamics!

Authors:  Paolo Pelosi; Enrico Calzia; Pierre Asfar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  What is your strategy for fluid management?

Authors:  Young-Cheol Woo
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-04-23

4.  Respiratory induced dynamic variations of stroke volume and its surrogates as predictors of fluid responsiveness: applicability in the early stages of specific critical states.

Authors:  Jan Benes; Jan Zatloukal; Jakub Kletecka; Alena Simanova; Lenka Haidingerova; Richard Pradl
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  Interactions between respiration and systemic hemodynamics. Part II: practical implications in critical care.

Authors:  François Feihl; Alain F Broccard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Is intraabdominal pressure a good predictor of mortality in necrotizing enterocolitis?

Authors:  Arnaud Bonnard; Elisabeth Carricaburu; Corinne Alberti; Laure Maury; Carole Saizou; Alaa El Ghoneimi; Stéphane Dauger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  The polycompartment syndrome: towards an understanding of the interactions between different compartments!

Authors:  Manu L N G Malbrain; Alexander Wilmer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Applicability of stroke volume variation in patients of a general intensive care unit: a longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Sebastian Mair; Julia Tschirdewahn; Simon Götz; Johanna Frank; Veit Phillip; Benedikt Henschel; Caroline Schultheiss; Ulrich Mayr; Sebastian Noe; Matthias Treiber; Roland M Schmid; Bernd Saugel; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 9.  Cardiopulmonary interactions and volume status assessment.

Authors:  Alain F Broccard
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 10.  Current insights in intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome: open the abdomen and keep it open!

Authors:  Inneke E De Laet; Mariska Ravyts; Wesley Vidts; Jody Valk; Jan J De Waele; Manu L N G Malbrain
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.