OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of tidal volume on the capacity of pulse pressure variation (DeltaPP) to predict fluid responsiveness. DESIGN: Prospective interventional study. SETTING: A 31-bed university hospital medico-surgical ICU. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Sixty mechanically ventilated critically ill patients requiring fluid challenge, separated according to their tidal volume. INTERVENTION: Fluid challenge with either 1,000 ml crystalloids or 500 ml colloids. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Complete hemodynamic measurements including DeltaPP were obtained before and after fluid challenge. Tidal volume was lower than 7 ml/kg in 26 patients, between 7-8 ml/kg in 9 patients, and greater than 8 ml/kg in 27 patients. ROC curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value of DeltaPP at different tidal volume thresholds, and 8 ml/kg best identified different behaviors. Overall, the cardiac index increased from 2.66 (2.00-3.47) to 3.04 (2.44-3.96) l/min m(2) ( P <0.001). It increased by more than 15% in 33 patients (fluid responders). Pulmonary artery occluded pressure was lower and DeltaPP higher in responders than in non-responders, but fluid responsiveness was better predicted with DeltaPP (ROC curve area 0.76+/-0.06) than with pulmonary artery occluded pressure (0.71+/-0.07) and right atrial (0.56+/-0.08) pressures. Despite similar response to fluid challenge in low (<8 ml/kg) and high tidal volume groups, the percent of correct classification of a 12% DeltaPP was 51% in the low tidal volume group and 88% in the high tidal volume group. CONCLUSIONS: DeltaPP is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients only when tidal volume is at least 8 ml/kg.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of tidal volume on the capacity of pulse pressure variation (DeltaPP) to predict fluid responsiveness. DESIGN: Prospective interventional study. SETTING: A 31-bed university hospital medico-surgical ICU. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Sixty mechanically ventilated critically ill patients requiring fluid challenge, separated according to their tidal volume. INTERVENTION: Fluid challenge with either 1,000 ml crystalloids or 500 ml colloids. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Complete hemodynamic measurements including DeltaPP were obtained before and after fluid challenge. Tidal volume was lower than 7 ml/kg in 26 patients, between 7-8 ml/kg in 9 patients, and greater than 8 ml/kg in 27 patients. ROC curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value of DeltaPP at different tidal volume thresholds, and 8 ml/kg best identified different behaviors. Overall, the cardiac index increased from 2.66 (2.00-3.47) to 3.04 (2.44-3.96) l/min m(2) ( P <0.001). It increased by more than 15% in 33 patients (fluid responders). Pulmonary artery occluded pressure was lower and DeltaPP higher in responders than in non-responders, but fluid responsiveness was better predicted with DeltaPP (ROC curve area 0.76+/-0.06) than with pulmonary artery occluded pressure (0.71+/-0.07) and right atrial (0.56+/-0.08) pressures. Despite similar response to fluid challenge in low (<8 ml/kg) and high tidal volume groups, the percent of correct classification of a 12% DeltaPP was 51% in the low tidal volume group and 88% in the high tidal volume group. CONCLUSIONS: DeltaPP is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients only when tidal volume is at least 8 ml/kg.
Authors: J L Teboul; M R Pinsky; A Mercat; N Anguel; G Bernardin; J M Achard; T Boulain; C Richard Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Karim Chergui; Roch Augarde; Sebastien Prin; Bernard Page; Alain Beauchet; François Jardin Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2003-07-17 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Andrés Esteban; Antonio Anzueto; Fernando Frutos; Inmaculada Alía; Laurent Brochard; Thomas E Stewart; Salvador Benito; Scott K Epstein; Carlos Apezteguía; Peter Nightingale; Alejandro C Arroliga; Martin J Tobin Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-01-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: F Michard; D Chemla; C Richard; M Wysocki; M R Pinsky; Y Lecarpentier; J L Teboul Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Daniel A Reuter; Thomas W Felbinger; Christian Schmidt; Erich Kilger; Oliver Goedje; Peter Lamm; Alwin E Goetz Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2002-03-20 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Daniel A Reuter; Julian Bayerlein; Matthias S G Goepfert; Florian C Weis; Erich Kilger; Peter Lamm; Alwin E Goetz Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2003-02-11 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Azriel Perel; Bernd Saugel; Jean-Louis Teboul; Manu L N G Malbrain; Francisco Javier Belda; Enrique Fernández-Mondéjar; Mikhail Kirov; Julia Wendon; Roger Lussmann; Marco Maggiorini Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Charalampos Pierrakos; Dimitrios Velissaris; Sabino Scolletta; Sarah Heenen; Daniel De Backer; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Daniel De Backer; Jan Bakker; Maurizio Cecconi; Ludhmila Hajjar; Da Wei Liu; Suzanna Lobo; Xavier Monnet; Andrea Morelli; Sheila Neinan Myatra; Azriel Perel; Michael R Pinsky; Bernd Saugel; Jean-Louis Teboul; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 17.440