Literature DB >> 8267179

A comparison of systolic blood pressure variations and echocardiographic estimates of end-diastolic left ventricular size in patients after aortic surgery.

P Coriat1, M Vrillon, A Perel, J F Baron, F Le Bret, M Saada, P Viars.   

Abstract

As suggested by experimental studies, systolic pressure variation (SPV), the difference between maximum and minimum values of systolic blood pressure after a single positive pressure breath, may be a fair indicator of left ventricular preload. SPV was quantified in 21 patients who had undergone abdominal aortic surgery and were sedated under mechanical ventilation. The aim of the study was to assess the ability of this parameter to qualitatively estimate left ventricular preload measured using transesophageal echocardiography. All patients had preoperative radionuclide ejection fraction > 45%. Postoperative mechanical ventilatory patterns were the same for all patients: tidal volume = 10 mL/kg; respiratory frequency = 12-14 breaths/min; and zero end-expiratory pressure mode. Left ventricular dimensions at end-diastole correlated well with the magnitude of both SPV (r = 0.80) and its delta down (dDown) component (i.e., the degree by which systolic pressure decreases with each mechanical breath) (r = 0.83). Once the first measurement was completed, volume loading with two increments of 250 mL of human albumin 5% was performed in all but three patients. Each volume loading step caused a significant increase in the end-diastolic area (EDa) index (7.0 +/- 1.6 to 8.5 +/- 1.6 cm2/m2) and cardiac index (CI) (3.1 +/- 0.9 to 4.1 +/- 0.9 L.min-1 x m-2) and a concomitant significant decrease in the SPV (8.6 +/- 4.5 to 6.1 +/- 3.7 mm Hg) and its dDown component (5.9 +/- 4.1 to 2.9 +/- 2 mm Hg).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8267179     DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199401000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  30 in total

1.  Beat-to-beat blood pressure variability and patent ductus arteriosus in ventilated, premature infants.

Authors:  Alain Beuchée; Patrick Pladys; Lotfi Senhadji; Pierre Bétrémieux; François Carré
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 2.  Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care.

Authors:  Karim Bendjelid; Jacques-A Romand
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Systolic blood pressure at end-expiration measured by the automated systolic pressure variation monitor is equivalent to systolic blood pressure during apnea.

Authors:  H A Schwid; G A Rooke
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Monitoring of respiratory variations of aortic blood flow velocity using esophageal Doppler.

Authors:  Michel Slama; Henri Masson; Jean-Louis Teboul; Marie-Luce Arnould; Rachida Nait-Kaoudjt; Bouchra Colas; Marcel Peltier; Christophe Tribouilloy; Dinko Susic; Edward Frohlich; Michel Andréjak
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Pulse-plethysmographic variables in hemodynamic assessment during mannitol infusion.

Authors:  M Radhakrishnan; K Mohanvelu; S Veena; G Sripathy; G S Umamaheswara Rao
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 6.  Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Mateo Aboy; Christoph K Hofer; Mohamed Rehman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  It's time to measure intra-abdominal pressure to optimize hemodynamics!

Authors:  Paolo Pelosi; Enrico Calzia; Pierre Asfar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Increased intra-abdominal pressure affects respiratory variations in arterial pressure in normovolaemic and hypovolaemic mechanically ventilated healthy pigs.

Authors:  Serge Duperret; Franck Lhuillier; Vincent Piriou; Emmanuel Vivier; Olivier Metton; Patricia Branche; Guy Annat; Karim Bendjelid; Jean Paul Viale
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Interactions between respiration and systemic hemodynamics. Part II: practical implications in critical care.

Authors:  François Feihl; Alain F Broccard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Sarah Heenen; Michael Piagnerelli; Marc Koch; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.