Literature DB >> 27817009

Applicability of stroke volume variation in patients of a general intensive care unit: a longitudinal observational study.

Sebastian Mair1, Julia Tschirdewahn1, Simon Götz1, Johanna Frank1, Veit Phillip1, Benedikt Henschel1, Caroline Schultheiss1, Ulrich Mayr1, Sebastian Noe1, Matthias Treiber1, Roland M Schmid1, Bernd Saugel2, Wolfgang Huber3.   

Abstract

Sinus rhythm (SR) and controlled mechanical ventilation (CV) are mandatory for the applicability of respiratory changes of the arterial curve such as stroke volume variation (SVV) to predict fluid-responsiveness. Furthermore, several secondary limitations including tidal volumes <8 mL/kg and SVV-values within the "gray zone" of 9-13% impair prediction of fluid-responsiveness by SVV. Therefore, we investigated the prevalence of these four conditions in general ICU-patients. This longitudinal observational study analyzed a prospectively maintained haemodynamic database including 4801 transpulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis measurements of 278 patients (APACHE-II 21.0 ± 7.4). The main underlying diseases were cirrhosis (32%), sepsis (28%), and ARDS (17%). The prevalence of SR and CV was only 19.4% (54/278) in the first measurements (primary endpoint), 18.8% (902/4801) in all measurements and 26.5% (9/34) in measurements with MAP < 65 mmHg and CI < 2.5 L/min/m2 and vasopressor therapy. In 69.1% (192/278) of the first measurements and in 65.9% (3165/4801) of all measurements the patients had SR but did not have CV. In 1.8% (5/278) of the first measurements and in 2.5% (119/4801) of all measurements the patients had CV but lacked SR. In 9.7% (27/278) of the first measurements and in 12.8% (615/4801) of all measurements the patients did neither have SR nor CV. Only 20 of 278 (7.2%) of the first measurements and 8.2% of all measurements fulfilled both major criteria (CV, SR) and both minor criteria for the applicability of SVV. The applicability of SVV in ICU-patients is limited due to the absence of mandatory criteria during the majority of measurements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Applicability; Atrial fibrillation; Controlled ventilation; Pulse pressure variation; Sinus rhythm; Stroke volume variation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27817009     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9951-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  51 in total

1.  Influence of tidal volume on stroke volume variation. Does it really matter?

Authors:  Frédéric Michard; Jean-Louis Teboul; Christian Richard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-08-02       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury.

Authors:  Herbert P Wiedemann; Arthur P Wheeler; Gordon R Bernard; B Taylor Thompson; Douglas Hayden; Ben deBoisblanc; Alfred F Connors; R Duncan Hite; Andrea L Harabin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a "gray zone" approach.

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Yannick Le Manach; Christoph K Hofer; Jean Pierre Goarin; Jean-Jacques Lehot; Benoît Vallet; Benoît Tavernier
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 4.  The transpulmonary thermodilution technique.

Authors:  Samir G Sakka; Daniel A Reuter; Azriel Perel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Michael Baram; Bobbak Vahid
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  The influence of the airway driving pressure on pulsed pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  Laurent Muller; Guillaume Louart; Philippe-Jean Bousquet; Damien Candela; Lana Zoric; Jean-Emmanuel de La Coussaye; Samir Jaber; Jean-Yves Lefrant
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Daily interruption of sedative infusions and complications of critical illness in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  William D Schweickert; Brian K Gehlbach; Anne S Pohlman; Jesse B Hall; John P Kress
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  It is amazing what you can see if you look.

Authors:  Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Cardiac index and oxygen delivery during low and high tidal volume ventilation strategies in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a crossover randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Giuseppe Natalini; Cosetta Minelli; Antonio Rosano; Pierluigi Ferretti; Carmine R Militano; Carlo De Feo; Achille Bernardini
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Pre-existing atrial fibrillation and risk of arterial thromboembolism and death in intensive care unit patients: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Jacob Gamst; Christian Fynbo Christiansen; Bodil Steen Rasmussen; Lars Hvilsted Rasmussen; Reimar Wernich Thomsen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  [Treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis].

Authors:  Wolfgang Huber; Hana Algül
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2017 end of year summary: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A H Critchley; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Update on the assessment of fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  Koichi Suehiro
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Advanced hemodynamic monitoring in intensive care medicine : A German web-based survey study.

Authors:  B Saugel; P C Reese; J Y Wagner; M Buerke; W Huber; S Kluge; R Prondzinsky
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 0.840

5.  Mandatory criteria for the application of variability-based parameters of fluid responsiveness: a prospective study in different groups of ICU patients.

Authors:  Wolfgang Huber; Uli Mayr; Andreas Umgelter; Michael Franzen; Wolfgang Reindl; Roland M Schmid; Florian Eckel
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 6.  Where Are We Heading With Fluid Responsiveness and Septic Shock?

Authors:  Mohammed Megri; Emily Fridenmaker; Margaret Disselkamp
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-03

7.  Changes in stroke volume induced by lung recruitment maneuver can predict fluid responsiveness during intraoperative lung-protective ventilation in prone position.

Authors:  Ryota Watanabe; Koichi Suehiro; Akira Mukai; Katsuaki Tanaka; Tokuhiro Yamada; Takashi Mori; Kiyonobu Nishikawa
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.217

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.