Literature DB >> 9856704

Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension.

B Tavernier1, O Makhotine, G Lebuffe, J Dupont, P Scherpereel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Monitoring left ventricular preload is critical to achieve adequate fluid resuscitation in patients with hypotension and sepsis. This prospective study tested the correlation of the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, the left ventricular end-diastolic area index measured by transesophageal echocardiography, the arterial systolic pressure variation (the difference between maximal and minimal systolic blood pressure values during one mechanical breath), and its delta down (dDown) component (= apneic - minimum systolic blood pressure) with the response of cardiac output to volume expansion during sepsis.
METHODS: Preload parameters were measured at baseline and during graded volume expansion (increments of 500 ml) in 15 patients with sepsis-induced hypotension who required mechanical ventilation. Each volume-loading step (VLS) was classified as a responder (increase in stroke volume index > or = 15%) or a nonresponder. Successive VLSs were performed until a nonresponder VLS was obtained.
RESULTS: Thirty-five VLSs (21 responders) were performed. Fluid loading caused an overall significant increase in pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and end-diastolic area index, and a significant decrease in systolic pressure variation and delta down (P < 0.01). There was a significant difference between responder and nonresponder VLSs in end-diastolic area index, systolic pressure variation, and dDown, but not in pulmonary artery occlusion pressure. Receiver-operator curve analysis showed that dDown was a more accurate indicator of the response of stroke volume index to volume loading than end-diastolic area index and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure. A dDown component of more than 5 mmHg indicated that the stroke volume index would increase in response to a subsequent fluid challenge (positive and negative predictive values: 95% and 93%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The dDown component of the systolic pressure variation is a sensitive indicator of the response of cardiac output to volume infusion in patient with sepsis-induced hypotension who require mechanical ventilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9856704     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199812000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  81 in total

1.  Functional hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-03-20       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care.

Authors:  Karim Bendjelid; Jacques-A Romand
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Systolic blood pressure at end-expiration measured by the automated systolic pressure variation monitor is equivalent to systolic blood pressure during apnea.

Authors:  H A Schwid; G A Rooke
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Influence of tidal volume on stroke volume variation. Does it really matter?

Authors:  Frédéric Michard; Jean-Louis Teboul; Christian Richard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-08-02       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Monitoring of respiratory variations of aortic blood flow velocity using esophageal Doppler.

Authors:  Michel Slama; Henri Masson; Jean-Louis Teboul; Marie-Luce Arnould; Rachida Nait-Kaoudjt; Bouchra Colas; Marcel Peltier; Christophe Tribouilloy; Dinko Susic; Edward Frohlich; Michel Andréjak
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Pulse-plethysmographic variables in hemodynamic assessment during mannitol infusion.

Authors:  M Radhakrishnan; K Mohanvelu; S Veena; G Sripathy; G S Umamaheswara Rao
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 7.  Accuracy of plethysmographic indices as predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudio Sandroni; Fabio Cavallaro; Cristina Marano; Chiara Falcone; Paolo De Santis; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Mateo Aboy; Christoph K Hofer; Mohamed Rehman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 9.  Interpretation of blood pressure signal: physiological bases, clinical relevance, and objectives during shock states.

Authors:  J-F Augusto; J-L Teboul; P Radermacher; P Asfar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Sarah Heenen; Michael Piagnerelli; Marc Koch; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.