Literature DB >> 20390324

Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?

Maxime Cannesson1, Mateo Aboy, Christoph K Hofer, Mohamed Rehman.   

Abstract

In the present review we will describe and discuss the physiological and technological background necessary in understanding the dynamic parameters of fluid responsiveness and how they relate to recent softwares and algorithms' applications. We will also discuss the potential clinical applications of these parameters in the management of patients under general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation along with the potential improvements in the computational algorithms.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 20390324     DOI： 10.1007/s10877-010-9229-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN： 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  99 in total

1.  A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients.

Authors:  James Dean Sandham; Russell Douglas Hull; Rollin Frederick Brant; Linda Knox; Graham Frederick Pineo; Christopher J Doig; Denny P Laporta; Sidney Viner; Louise Passerini; Hugh Devitt; Ann Kirby; Michael Jacka
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Variations in arterial blood pressure and photoplethysmography during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Natalini; Antonio Rosano; Maria E Franceschetti; Paola Facchetti; Achille Bernardini
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Can pulse pressure variations really better predict fluid responsiveness than static indices of preload in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome?

Authors:  Didier Payen; Fabrice Vallée; Arnaud Mari; Jean Christophe M Richard; Daniel De Backer
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Pleth variability index to monitor the respiratory variations in the pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform amplitude and predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre.

Authors:  M Cannesson; O Desebbe; P Rosamel; B Delannoy; J Robin; O Bastien; J-J Lehot
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  The ability of a novel algorithm for automatic estimation of the respiratory variations in arterial pulse pressure to monitor fluid responsiveness in the operating room.

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Juliette Slieker; Olivier Desebbe; Christian Bauer; Pascal Chiari; Roland Hénaine; Jean-Jacques Lehot
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 6.  Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Michael Baram; Bobbak Vahid
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery.

Authors:  Tong J Gan; Andrew Soppitt; Mohamed Maroof; Habib el-Moalem; Kerri M Robertson; Eugene Moretti; Peter Dwane; Peter S A Glass
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy.

Authors:  Marc Feissel; Frédéric Michard; Jean-Pierre Faller; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Hemodynamic monitoring over the past 10 years.

Authors:  Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marcel R Lopes; Marcos A Oliveira; Vanessa Oliveira S Pereira; Ivaneide Paula B Lemos; Jose Otavio C Auler; Frédéric Michard
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097
View more
  22 in total

1.  Relations between respiratory changes in R-wave amplitude and arterial pulse pressure in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Geoffray Keller; Olivier Desebbe; Jean-Jacques Lehot
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Visual estimation of pulse pressure variation is not reliable: a randomized simulation study.

Authors:  Joseph Rinehart; Tanzeem Islam; Rob Boud; Allison Nguyen; Brenton Alexander; Cecilia Canales; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Respiratory variations in the arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation reflect volume status and fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  Azriel Perel; Reuven Pizov; Shamay Cotev
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  A systematic review of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac and thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Federico Piccioni; Filippo Bernasconi; Giulia T A Tramontano; Martin Langer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Arterial Pressure Variation in Elective Noncardiac Surgery: Identifying Reference Distributions and Modifying Factors.

Authors:  Michael R Mathis; Samuel A Schechtman; Milo C Engoren; Amy M Shanks; Aleda Thompson; Sachin Kheterpal; Kevin K Tremper
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Respiratory variation in peak aortic velocity accurately predicts fluid responsiveness in children undergoing neurosurgery under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Kavita G Morparia; Srijaya K Reddy; Laura J Olivieri; Michael C Spaeder; Jennifer J Schuette
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Combination of continuous pulse pressure variation monitoring and cardiac filling pressure to predict fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  Geoffray Keller; Karin Sinavsky; Olivier Desebbe; Jean-Jacques Lehot
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness Using Pulse Pressure Variation in Infants Undergoing Ventricular Septal Defect Repair with Median Sternotomy or Minimally Invasive Right Thoracotomy.

Authors:  Ding Han; Ya-Guang Liu; Yi Luo; Jia Li; Chuan Ou-Yang
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 9.  Functional haemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.687

Review 10.  Supporting hemodynamics: what should we target? What treatments should we use?

Authors:  Luciano Gattinoni; Eleonora Carlesso
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.097
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.