Literature DB >> 24151007

Respiratory induced dynamic variations of stroke volume and its surrogates as predictors of fluid responsiveness: applicability in the early stages of specific critical states.

Jan Benes1, Jan Zatloukal, Jakub Kletecka, Alena Simanova, Lenka Haidingerova, Richard Pradl.   

Abstract

Respiratory induced dynamic variations of stroke volume and its surrogates are very sensitive and specific predictors of fluid responsiveness, but their use as targets for volume management can be limited. In a recent study, limiting factors were present in 53 % of surgical patients with inserted arterial line. In the intensive care unit (ICU) population the frequency is presumably higher, but the real prevalence is unknown. Our goal was to study the feasibility of dynamic variations guided initial volume resuscitation in specific critical states. We have performed a 5 year retrospective evaluation of patients admitted with diagnosis sepsis, polytrauma, after high risk surgery or cardiac arrest. Occurrence of major (sedation, mandatory ventilation and tidal volume, open chest and arrhythmias) and minor limiting factors (PEEP level, use of vasopressors and presence of arterial catheter) was screened within the first 24 h after admission. In the study period 1296 patients were hospitalized in our ICU with severe sepsis (n = 242), polytrauma (n = 561), after high risk surgery (n = 351) or cardiac arrest (n = 141). From these patients 549 (42.4 %) fulfilled all major criteria for applicability of dynamic variations. In our evaluation only limited number of patients admitted for polytrauma (51 %), sepsis (37 %), after cardiac arrest (39 %) or surgical procedure (33 %) fulfil all the major criteria for use of dynamic variations at the ICU admission. The prevalence was similar in patients with shock. Occurrence of minor factors can pose further bias in evaluation of these patients. General use of dynamic variations guided protocols for initial resuscitations seems not universally applicable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24151007     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-013-9524-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  31 in total

1.  Increased intra-abdominal pressure affects respiratory variations in arterial pressure in normovolaemic and hypovolaemic mechanically ventilated healthy pigs.

Authors:  Serge Duperret; Franck Lhuillier; Vincent Piriou; Emmanuel Vivier; Olivier Metton; Patricia Branche; Guy Annat; Karim Bendjelid; Jean Paul Viale
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation during modifications of arterial pressure.

Authors:  Jens C Kubitz; Stefanie Forkl; Thorsten Annecke; Nils Kronas; Alwin E Goetz; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a "gray zone" approach.

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Yannick Le Manach; Christoph K Hofer; Jean Pierre Goarin; Jean-Jacques Lehot; Benoît Vallet; Benoît Tavernier
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Stroke volume variation: from applied physiology to improved outcomes.

Authors:  Frederic Michard
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients experiencing intra-abdominal hypertension.

Authors:  Xiaomei Liu; Qiang Fu; Weidong Mi; Henian Liu; Hong Zhang; Peiji Wang
Journal:  Biosci Trends       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.400

6.  Clinical use of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP.

Authors:  F Michard; D Chemla; C Richard; M Wysocki; M R Pinsky; Y Lecarpentier; J L Teboul
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 7.  Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Michael Baram; Bobbak Vahid
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Passive leg raising.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model.

Authors:  Jochen Renner; Matthias Gruenewald; Rene Quaden; Robert Hanss; Patrick Meybohm; Markus Steinfath; Jens Scholz; Berthold Bein
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marcel R Lopes; Marcos A Oliveira; Vanessa Oliveira S Pereira; Ivaneide Paula B Lemos; Jose Otavio C Auler; Frédéric Michard
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  12 in total

1.  Applicability of stroke volume variation in patients of a general intensive care unit: a longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Sebastian Mair; Julia Tschirdewahn; Simon Götz; Johanna Frank; Veit Phillip; Benedikt Henschel; Caroline Schultheiss; Ulrich Mayr; Sebastian Noe; Matthias Treiber; Roland M Schmid; Bernd Saugel; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Mandatory criteria for the application of variability-based parameters of fluid responsiveness: a prospective study in different groups of ICU patients.

Authors:  Wolfgang Huber; Uli Mayr; Andreas Umgelter; Michael Franzen; Wolfgang Reindl; Roland M Schmid; Florian Eckel
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  It is amazing what you can see if you look.

Authors:  Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Applicability of pulse pressure variation: how many shades of grey?

Authors:  Frederic Michard; Denis Chemla; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Fluid responsiveness is about stroke volume, and not pulse pressure Yogi: the power of Doppler fluid management and cardiovascular monitoring.

Authors:  Rob Phillips; Joe Brierley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) before, during and after Sustained Low Efficiency Dialysis (SLED). A Prospective Study on Feasibility of TPTD and Prediction of Successful Fluid Removal.

Authors:  Wolfgang Huber; Stephan Fuchs; Andreas Minning; Claudius Küchle; Marlena Braun; Analena Beitz; Caroline Schultheiss; Sebastian Mair; Veit Phillip; Sebastian Schmid; Roland M Schmid; Tobias Lahmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The effect of fluid resuscitation on the effective circulating volume in patients undergoing liver surgery: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jaap Jan Vos; A F Kalmar; H G D Hendriks; J Bakker; T W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 8.  Applicability of respiratory variations in stroke volume and its surrogates for dynamic fluid responsiveness prediction in critically ill patients: a systematic review of the prevalence of required conditions.

Authors:  Leandro Utino Taniguchi; Fernando Godinho Zampieri; Antonio Paulo Nassar
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

9.  Applicability of Pulse Pressure Variation during Unstable Hemodynamic Events in the Intensive Care Unit: A Five-Day Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Bertrand Delannoy; Florent Wallet; Delphine Maucort-Boulch; Mathieu Page; Mahmoud Kaaki; Mathieu Schoeffler; Brenton Alexander; Olivier Desebbe
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2016-03-31

Review 10.  Fluid Therapy: Double-Edged Sword during Critical Care?

Authors:  Jan Benes; Mikhail Kirov; Vsevolod Kuzkov; Mitja Lainscak; Zsolt Molnar; Gorazd Voga; Xavier Monnet
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.