Literature DB >> 17089376

Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design.

Nadine Gaab1, John D E Gabrieli, Gary H Glover.   

Abstract

Several studies reported decreased signal intensities within auditory areas for experimental designs employing continuous scanner background noise (SBN) in comparison to designs with less or no SBN. This study examined the source for this SBN-induced masking effect of the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) response by directly comparing two experimental sessions with the same auditory stimulation, which was presented either with or without recorded scanner background noise (RecSBN). Ten subjects listened to a series of four one-syllable words and had to decide whether two of the words were identical. The words were either presented with a silent background or with added RecSBN. This was then contrasted with either silence or RecSBN. A sparse temporal sampling method was used in both sessions, which enabled us to directly assess the influence of RecSBN without varying scanning parameters, acquisition quantities, or auditory stimulations. Our results suggest that previously reported SBN-induced masking of the BOLD response in experimental designs with SBN might be caused by an interaction between increased baseline levels and nonlinearity effects within auditory cortices. Adding SBN to an experimental condition does not enhance signal intensities to the same degree that SBN does when presented with a silent background, and therefore contrasting an experimental and baseline condition that both have SBN may lead to signal decreases. In addition, our study shows this effect is greatest in Heschl's gyrus, but can also be observed in higher-order auditory areas. 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17089376      PMCID: PMC6871331          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  40 in total

1.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging measurements of sound-level encoding in the absence of background scanner noise.

Authors:  D A Hall; M P Haggard; A Q Summerfield; M A Akeroyd; A R Palmer; R W Bowtell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Noise affects auditory and linguistic processing differently: an MEG study.

Authors:  C S Herrmann; U Oertel; Y Wang; B Maess; A D Friederici
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-02-07       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  The effect of sequence repeat time on auditory cortex stimulation during phonetic discrimination.

Authors:  N J Shah; S Steinhoff; S Mirzazade; O Zafiris; M L Grosse-Ruyken; L Jäncke; K Zilles
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Effects of acoustic gradient noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  N Novitski; K Alho; O Korzyukov; S Carlson; S Martinkauppi; C Escera; T Rinne; H J Aronen; R Näätänen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Impact of fMRI acoustic noise on the functional anatomy of visual mental imagery.

Authors:  A Mazard; B Mazoyer; O Etard; N Tzourio-Mazoyer; S M Kosslyn; E Mellet
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Intensity-dependent activation of the primary auditory cortex in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Katie J Lasota; John L Ulmer; Jill B Firszt; Bharat B Biswal; David L Daniels; Robert W Prost
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 7.  Acoustic noise and functional magnetic resonance imaging: current strategies and future prospects.

Authors:  Edson Amaro; Steve C R Williams; Sukhi S Shergill; Cynthia H Y Fu; Mairead MacSweeney; Marco M Picchioni; Michael J Brammer; Philip K McGuire
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Regularized higher-order in vivo shimming.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Kim; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Gary H Glover; Daniel M Spielman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Influence of acoustic masking noise in fMRI of the auditory cortex during phonetic discrimination.

Authors:  N J Shah; L Jäncke; M L Grosse-Ruyken; H W Müller-Gärtner
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise.

Authors:  P A Bandettini; A Jesmanowicz; J Van Kylen; R M Birn; J S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  41 in total

1.  Multivariate activation and connectivity patterns discriminate speech intelligibility in Wernicke's, Broca's, and Geschwind's areas.

Authors:  Daniel A Abrams; Srikanth Ryali; Tianwen Chen; Evan Balaban; Daniel J Levitin; Vinod Menon
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Neural correlates of audiotactile phonetic processing in early-blind readers: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Morteza Pishnamazi; Yasaman Nojaba; Habib Ganjgahi; Asie Amousoltani; Mohammad Ali Oghabian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Silent and continuous fMRI scanning differentially modulate activation in an auditory language comprehension task.

Authors:  Conny F Schmidt; Tino Zaehle; Martin Meyer; Eveline Geiser; Peter Boesiger; Lutz Jancke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Influence of selecting EPI readout-encoding bandwidths on arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI.

Authors:  Geon-Ho Jahng; Norbert Schuff
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Mental imagery generation in different modalities activates sensory-motor areas.

Authors:  Massimiliano Palmiero; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli; Davide Nardo; Carlo Sestieri; Rosalia Di Matteo; Alessandro D'Ausilio; Gian Luca Romani
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-09

7.  Resting in peace or noise: scanner background noise suppresses default-mode network.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Neural signatures of semantic and phonemic fluency in young and old adults.

Authors:  Marcus Meinzer; Tobias Flaisch; Lotte Wilser; Carsten Eulitz; Brigitte Rockstroh; Tim Conway; Leslie Gonzalez-Rothi; Bruce Crosson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  The influence of rest period instructions on the default mode network.

Authors:  Christopher Benjamin; Daniel A Lieberman; Maria Chang; Noa Ofen; Sue Whitfield-Gabrieli; John D E Gabrieli; Nadine Gaab
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Evaluating an acoustically quiet EPI sequence for use in fMRI studies of speech and auditory processing.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle; Rowena J Eason; Sebastian Schmitter; Christian Schwarzbauer; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.