Literature DB >> 12412026

Acoustic noise and functional magnetic resonance imaging: current strategies and future prospects.

Edson Amaro1, Steve C R Williams, Sukhi S Shergill, Cynthia H Y Fu, Mairead MacSweeney, Marco M Picchioni, Michael J Brammer, Philip K McGuire.   

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has become the method of choice for studying the neural correlates of cognitive tasks. Nevertheless, the scanner produces acoustic noise during the image acquisition process, which is a problem in the study of auditory pathway and language generally. The scanner acoustic noise not only produces activation in brain regions involved in auditory processing, but also interferes with the stimulus presentation. Several strategies can be used to address this problem, including modifications of hardware and software. Although reduction of the source of the acoustic noise would be ideal, substantial hardware modifications to the current base of installed MRI systems would be required. Therefore, the most common strategy employed to minimize the problem involves software modifications. In this work we consider three main types of acquisitions: compressed, partially silent, and silent. For each implementation, paradigms using block and event-related designs are assessed. We also provide new data, using a silent event-related (SER) design, which demonstrate higher blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response to a simple auditory cue when compared to a conventional image acquisition. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12412026     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  45 in total

Review 1.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Nonlinearity of FMRI responses in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Thomas M Talavage; Whitney B Edmister
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Extraction of overt verbal response from the acoustic noise in a functional magnetic resonance imaging scan by use of segmented active noise cancellation.

Authors:  Kwan-Jin Jung; Parikshit Prasad; Yulin Qin; John R Anderson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  fMRI-acoustic noise alters brain activation during working memory tasks.

Authors:  D Tomasi; E C Caparelli; L Chang; T Ernst
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Effect of fMRI acoustic noise on non-auditory working memory task: comparison between continuous and pulsed sound emitting EPI.

Authors:  Sven Haller; Andreas J Bartsch; Ernst W Radue; Markus Klarhöfer; Erich Seifritz; Klaus Scheffler
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Silent and continuous fMRI scanning differentially modulate activation in an auditory language comprehension task.

Authors:  Conny F Schmidt; Tino Zaehle; Martin Meyer; Eveline Geiser; Peter Boesiger; Lutz Jancke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Characterizing response to elemental unit of acoustic imaging noise: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Gregory G Tamer; Wen-Ming Luh; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  A neuroimaging study of premotor lateralization and cerebellar involvement in the production of phonemes and syllables.

Authors:  Satrajit S Ghosh; Jason A Tourville; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.