Literature DB >> 11525334

Effects of acoustic gradient noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials.

N Novitski1, K Alho, O Korzyukov, S Carlson, S Martinkauppi, C Escera, T Rinne, H J Aronen, R Näätänen.   

Abstract

The processing of sound changes and involuntary attention to them has been widely studied with event-related brain potentials (ERPs). Recently, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been applied to determine the neural mechanisms of involuntary attention and the sources of the corresponding ERP components. The gradient-coil switching noise from the MRI scanner, however, is a challenge to any experimental design using auditory stimuli. In the present study, the effects of MRI noise on ERPs associated with preattentive processing of sound changes and involuntary switching of attention to them were investigated. Auditory stimuli consisted of frequently presented "standard" sounds, infrequent, slightly higher "deviant" sounds, and infrequent natural "novel" sounds. The standard and deviant sounds were either sinusoidal tones or musical chords, in separate stimulus sequences. The mismatch negativity (MMN) ERP associated with preattentive sound change detection was elicited by the deviant and novel sounds and was not affected by the prerecorded background MRI noise (in comparison with the condition with no background noise). The succeeding positive P3a ERP responses associated with involuntary attention switching elicited by novel sounds were also not affected by the MRI noise. However, in ERPs to standard tones and chords, the P1, N1, and P2 peak latencies were significantly prolonged by the MRI noise. Moreover, the amplitude of the subsequent "exogenous" N2 to the standard sounds was significantly attenuated by the presence of MRI noise. In conclusion, the present results suggest that in fMRI the background noise does not interfere with the imaging of auditory processing related to involuntary attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11525334     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  15 in total

1.  Assessment of temporal state-dependent interactions between auditory fMRI responses to desired and undesired acoustic sources.

Authors:  O Olulade; S Hu; J Gonzalez-Castillo; G G Tamer; W-M Luh; J L Ulmer; T M Talavage
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Using neuroimaging to understand the cortical mechanisms of auditory selective attention.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Eric Larson; Ross K Maddox; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Effects of age, age-related hearing loss, and contralateral cafeteria noise on the discrimination of small frequency changes: psychoacoustic and electrophysiological measures.

Authors:  Sibylle Bertoli; Jacek Smurzynski; Rudolf Probst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-09

5.  The influence of rest period instructions on the default mode network.

Authors:  Christopher Benjamin; Daniel A Lieberman; Maria Chang; Noa Ofen; Sue Whitfield-Gabrieli; John D E Gabrieli; Nadine Gaab
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  A real-time data acquisition and control of gradient coil noise for fMRI identification of hearing disorder in children with history of ear infection.

Authors:  Jaeseung Lee; James Holte; E Russell Ritenour
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2013-02

7.  Modeling hemodynamic responses in auditory cortex at 1.5 T using variable duration imaging acoustic noise.

Authors:  Shuowen Hu; Olumide Olulade; Javier Gonzalez Castillo; Joseph Santos; Sungeun Kim; Gregory G Tamer; Wen-Ming Luh; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Brain networks of novelty-driven involuntary and cued voluntary auditory attention shifting.

Authors:  Samantha Huang; John W Belliveau; Chinmayi Tengshe; Jyrki Ahveninen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Vowel-specific mismatch responses in the anterior superior temporal gyrus: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Alexander P Leff; Paul Iverson; Thomas M Schofield; James M Kilner; Jennifer T Crinion; Karl J Friston; Cathy J Price
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 10.  When Is Simultaneous Recording Necessary? A Guide for Researchers Considering Combined EEG-fMRI.

Authors:  Catriona L Scrivener
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.