Literature DB >> 11325127

Functional magnetic resonance imaging measurements of sound-level encoding in the absence of background scanner noise.

D A Hall1, M P Haggard, A Q Summerfield, M A Akeroyd, A R Palmer, R W Bowtell.   

Abstract

Effects of sound level on auditory cortical activation are seen in neuroimaging data. However, factors such as the cortical response to the intense ambient scanner noise and to the bandwidth of the acoustic stimuli will both confound precise quantification and interpretation of such sound-level effects. The present study used temporally "sparse" imaging to reduce effects of scanner noise. To achieve control for stimulus bandwidth, three schemes were compared for sound-level matching across bandwidth: component level, root-mean-square power and loudness. The calculation of the loudness match was based on the model reported by Moore and Glasberg [Acta Acust. 82, 335-345 (1996)]. Ten normally hearing volunteers were scanned using functional magnetic resonance imaging (tMRI) while listening to a 300-Hz tone presented at six different sound levels between 66 and 91 dB SPL and a harmonic-complex tone (F0= 186 Hz) presented at 65 and 85 dB SPL. This range of sound levels encompassed all three bases of sound-level matching. Activation in the superior temporal gyrus, induced by each of the eight tone conditions relative to a quiet baseline condition, was quantified as to extent and magnitude. Sound level had a small, but significant, effect on the extent of activation for the pure tone, but not for the harmonic-complex tone, while it had a significant effect on the response magnitude for both types of stimulus. Response magnitude increased linearly as a function of sound level for the full range of levels for the pure tone. The harmonic-complex tone produced greater activation than the pure tone, irrespective of the matching scheme for sound level, indicating that bandwidth had a greater effect on the pattern of auditory activation than sound level. Nevertheless, when the data were collapsed across stimulus class, extent and magnitude were significantly correlated with the loudness scale (measured in phons), but not with the intensity scale (measured in SPL). We therefore recommend the loudness formula as the most appropriate basis of matching sound level to control for loudness effects when cortical responses to other stimulus attributes, such as stimulus class, are the principal concern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11325127     DOI: 10.1121/1.1345697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

Review 1.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Effects of sound bandwidth on fMRI activation in human auditory brainstem nuclei.

Authors:  Monica L Hawley; Jennifer R Melcher; Barbara C Fullerton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Effects of sound level on fMRI activation in human brainstem, thalamic and cortical centers.

Authors:  Irina S Sigalovsky; Jennifer R Melcher
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Cortical FMRI activation to sequences of tones alternating in frequency: relationship to perceived rate and streaming.

Authors:  E Courtenay Wilson; Jennifer R Melcher; Christophe Micheyl; Alexander Gutschalk; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Silent and continuous fMRI scanning differentially modulate activation in an auditory language comprehension task.

Authors:  Conny F Schmidt; Tino Zaehle; Martin Meyer; Eveline Geiser; Peter Boesiger; Lutz Jancke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Tension-related activity in the orbitofrontal cortex and amygdala: an fMRI study with music.

Authors:  Moritz Lehne; Martin Rohrmeier; Stefan Koelsch
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  [Functional MRI of the hearing center].

Authors:  C M Krick; M Backens; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 9.  How challenges in auditory fMRI led to general advancements for the field.

Authors:  Thomas M Talavage; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  The auditory midbrain of people with tinnitus: abnormal sound-evoked activity revisited.

Authors:  Jennifer R Melcher; Robert A Levine; Christopher Bergevin; Barbara Norris
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.