Literature DB >> 11970784

Impact of fMRI acoustic noise on the functional anatomy of visual mental imagery.

A Mazard1, B Mazoyer, O Etard, N Tzourio-Mazoyer, S M Kosslyn, E Mellet.   

Abstract

One drawback of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is that the subject must endure intense noise during testing. We examined the possible role of such noise on the activation of early visual cortex during visual mental imagery. We postulated that noise may require subjects to work harder to pay attention to the task, which in turn could alter the activation pattern found in a silent environment. To test this hypothesis, we used positron emission tomography (PET) to monitor regional Cerebral Blood Flow (rCBF) of six subjects while they performed an imagery task either in a silent environment or in an "fMRI-like" noisy environment. Both noisy and silent imagery conditions, as compared to their respective baselines, resulted in activation of a bilateral fronto-parietal network (related to spatial processing), a bilateral inferior temporal area (related to shape processing), and deactivation of anterior calcarine cortex. Among the visual areas, rCBF increased in the most posterior part of the calcarine cortex, but at level just below the statistical threshold. However, blood flow values in the calcarine cortex during the silent imagery condition (but not the noisy imagery condition) were strongly negatively correlated with accuracy; the more challenging subjects found the task, the more strongly the calcarine cortex was activated. The subjects made more errors in the noisy condition than in the silent condition, and a direct comparison of the two conditions revealed that noise resulted in an increase in rCBF in the anterior cingulate cortex (involved in performance monitoring) and in the Wernicke's area (required to encode the verbal cues used in the task). These results thus demonstrate a nonadditive effect of fMRI gradient noise, resulting in a slight but significant effect on both performance and the neural activation pattern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11970784     DOI: 10.1162/089892902317236821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  22 in total

Review 1.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Sparse imaging and continuous event-related fMRI in the visual domain: a systematic comparison.

Authors:  Katharina Nebel; Philipp Stude; Holger Wiese; Bernhard Müller; Armin de Greiff; Michael Forsting; Hans-Christoph Diener; Matthias Keidel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  fMRI-acoustic noise alters brain activation during working memory tasks.

Authors:  D Tomasi; E C Caparelli; L Chang; T Ernst
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Effect of fMRI acoustic noise on non-auditory working memory task: comparison between continuous and pulsed sound emitting EPI.

Authors:  Sven Haller; Andreas J Bartsch; Ernst W Radue; Markus Klarhöfer; Erich Seifritz; Klaus Scheffler
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Pitfalls in FMRI.

Authors:  Sven Haller; Andreas J Bartsch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Effects of scanner acoustic noise on intrinsic brain activity during auditory stimulation.

Authors:  Natalia Yakunina; Eun Kyoung Kang; Tae Su Kim; Ji-Hoon Min; Sam Soo Kim; Eui-Cheol Nam
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Temporal pattern of acoustic imaging noise asymmetrically modulates activation in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ruwan D Ranaweera; Minseok Kwon; Shuowen Hu; Gregory G Tamer; Wen-Ming Luh; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  A real-time data acquisition and control of gradient coil noise for fMRI identification of hearing disorder in children with history of ear infection.

Authors:  Jaeseung Lee; James Holte; E Russell Ritenour
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2013-02

10.  Impact of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanner noise on affective state and attentional performance.

Authors:  Shawna N Jacob; Paula K Shear; Matthew Norris; Matthew Smith; Jeff Osterhage; Stephen M Strakowski; Michael Cerullo; David E Fleck; Jing-Huei Lee; James C Eliassen
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.