Literature DB >> 10674460

Noise affects auditory and linguistic processing differently: an MEG study.

C S Herrmann1, U Oertel, Y Wang, B Maess, A D Friederici.   

Abstract

We investigated the influence of noise on brain responses to spoken sentences in MEG. Sixteen subjects had to listen to acoustically presented sentences and judge their syntactic correctness. Sentences were either presented on a silent background or with noise. Noise had differential effects on early auditory and syntactic processes. While noise affected early auditory processes only in the right hemisphere, noise had a general effect on syntactical processes. The evoked responses to syntactic violations compared with correct sentences, namely an early left anterior negativity, were significantly suppressed when noise was present The noise suppression effect, however, was not lateralized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10674460     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200002070-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  7 in total

1.  Lateralized automatic auditory processing of phonetic versus musical information: a PET study.

Authors:  M Tervaniemi; S V Medvedev; K Alho; S V Pakhomov; M S Roudas; T L Van Zuijen; R Näätänen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Processing lexical semantic and syntactic information in first and second language: fMRI evidence from German and Russian.

Authors:  Shirley-Ann Rüschemeyer; Christian J Fiebach; Vera Kempe; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Silent and continuous fMRI scanning differentially modulate activation in an auditory language comprehension task.

Authors:  Conny F Schmidt; Tino Zaehle; Martin Meyer; Eveline Geiser; Peter Boesiger; Lutz Jancke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Time course of EEG oscillations during repeated listening of a well-known aria.

Authors:  Lutz Jäncke; Jürg Kühnis; Lars Rogenmoser; Stefan Elmer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Task Context Influences Brain Activation during Music Listening.

Authors:  Andjela Markovic; Jürg Kühnis; Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Pre-attentive modulation of brain responses to tones in coloured-hearing synesthetes.

Authors:  Lutz Jäncke; Lars Rogenmoser; Martin Meyer; Stefan Elmer
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.288

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.