Literature DB >> 10875906

The effect of sequence repeat time on auditory cortex stimulation during phonetic discrimination.

N J Shah1, S Steinhoff, S Mirzazade, O Zafiris, M L Grosse-Ruyken, L Jäncke, K Zilles.   

Abstract

Acoustic noise generated by the MR scanner gradient system during fMRI studies of auditory function is a very significant potential confound. Despite these deleterious effects, fMRI of the auditory cortex has been successful and numerous practitioners have circumvented the problem of acoustic masking noise. In the context of auditory cortex fMRI, the sequence repeat time (TR) has the effect of altering the length of time during which the scanner is quiet. Indeed, the move to whole-brain fMRI makes the problem of acoustic noise more acute and points to the need to examine the role of TR and its influence on the BOLD signal. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of varying the TR time on activation of auditory cortex during presentation and performance of a phonetic discrimination task. The results presented here demonstrate that the influence of sequence repeat time is considerable. For a short repeat time it is likely that the noise from the scanner is a significant mask and hinders accurate task performance. At the other extreme, a repeat time of 9 s is also suboptimal, probably due to attentional effects and lack of concentration and not least because of the longer overall measurement times. The results of this study point to a complicated interplay between psychophysical factors as well as physical parameters; attention, acoustic noise, total duration of the experiment, consideration of the volume of acquisition, and overall difficulty of the task have to be assessed and balanced. For the paradigm used here, the results suggest an optimal TR of around 6 s for a 16-slice acquisition. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10875906     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  10 in total

Review 1.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Neural correlates of audiotactile phonetic processing in early-blind readers: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Morteza Pishnamazi; Yasaman Nojaba; Habib Ganjgahi; Asie Amousoltani; Mohammad Ali Oghabian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Phonetic detail and lateralization of reading-related inner speech and of auditory and somatosensory feedback processing during overt reading.

Authors:  Christian A Kell; Maritza Darquea; Marion Behrens; Lorenzo Cordani; Christian Keller; Susanne Fuchs
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Auditory processing in remitted major depression: a long-term follow-up investigation using 3T-fMRI.

Authors:  Peter Zwanzger; M Zavorotnyy; J Diemer; T Ruland; K Domschke; M Christ; N Michael; B Pfleiderer
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Auditory processing of sine tones before, during and after ECT in depressed patients by fMRI.

Authors:  Martin Christ; Nikolaus Michael; Hermina Hihn; Anne Schüttke; Carsten Konrad; Bernhard T Baune; Andreas Jansen; Bettina Pfleiderer
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Atypical Relationships Between Neurofunctional Features of Print-Sound Integration and Reading Abilities in Chinese Children With Dyslexia.

Authors:  Zhichao Xia; Ting Yang; Xin Cui; Fumiko Hoeft; Hong Liu; Xianglin Zhang; Xiangping Liu; Hua Shu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-25

9.  Functional maps of human auditory cortex: effects of acoustic features and attention.

Authors:  David L Woods; G Christopher Stecker; Teemu Rinne; Timothy J Herron; Anthony D Cate; E William Yund; Isaac Liao; Xiaojian Kang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Paving the way for speech: voice-training-induced plasticity in chronic aphasia and apraxia of speech--three single cases.

Authors:  Monika Jungblut; Walter Huber; Christiane Mais; Ralph Schnitker
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 3.599

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.