Literature DB >> 17009027

3D femoral neck anteversion measurements based on the posterior femoral plane in ORTHODOC system.

Yeon Soo Lee1, Seung Hoon Oh, Jong Keun Seon, Eun Kyoo Song, Taek Rim Yoon.   

Abstract

This study provides a robust measuring method of the femoral neck anteversion angle for use in a total hip replacement pre-planning program. The femora of 24 patients (69.3 +/- 6.3 years old) were CT-scanned and converted into three-dimensionally volume-rendered models in ORTHODOC (ISS Inc., CA, USA) which is the pre-planning software for ROBODOC surgery. The Mod.ISS method (the modified ISS method), designed by authors, measures the anteversion angle of the proximal-most femoral neck confluence on the plane perpendicular to the femoral mechanical axis. 3D FNC method proposed by the authors of the present study involves measurement of the anteversion angle of three-dimensional femoral neck center on a plane perpendicular to the posterior femoral plane and parallel to the posterior condylar axis. Here, we found that interobserver reproducibility was 1.8 degrees (SD = 1.3) for the Mod.ISS method and 2.4 (SD = 1.9) for the proposed 3D FNC method. The anteversion angle of the local femoral neck axis was measured as theta = 25.3(L/D) + [corrected] 5.4 in L/D = 0.1-0.6, where L/D is distance (L) from the proximal-most neck confluence along the femoral mechanical axis, normalized with respect to the diameter of the femoral head (D). At L/D = 0.5, the anteversion angle of the femoral neck axis was coincident with the average femoral neck anteversion determined by the 3D FNC method. We conclude that the 3D FNC method is a gold standard for measuring the femoral neck anteversion applicable during both pre-operative and post-operative stages, because its femoral neck center can be determined in three-dimensional space during both stages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17009027     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-006-0104-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  20 in total

Review 1.  Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  D Tönnis; A Heinecke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Morphological study of the proximal femur: a new method of geometrical assessment using 3-dimensional reverse engineering.

Authors:  Banchong Mahaisavariya; Kriskrai Sitthiseripratip; Trongtum Tongdee; Erik L J Bohez; Jos Vander Sloten; Philip Oris
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  The effect of anteversion on femoral component stability assessed by radiostereometric analysis.

Authors:  H S Gill; J Alfaro-Adrián; C Alfaro-Adrián; P McLardy-Smith; D W Murray
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Determination and significance of femoral neck anteversion.

Authors:  Michael T Cibulka
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2004-06

5.  A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion.

Authors:  N Sugano; P C Noble; E Kamaric
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Femoral anteversion.

Authors:  S B Murphy; S R Simon; P K Kijewski; R H Wilkinson; N T Griscom
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The anatomy and functional axes of the femur.

Authors:  Y Yoshioka; D Siu; T D Cooke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Effects of anteversion on femoral bone mineral density and geometry measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a cadaver study.

Authors:  X G Cheng; P H Nicholson; S Boonen; P Brys; G Lowet; J Nijs; J Dequeker
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Femoral version and neck shaft angle.

Authors:  F Miller; M Merlo; Y Liang; P Kupcha; J Jamison; H T Harcke
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.324

10.  Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 1: 3D imaging method.

Authors:  J S Kim; T S Park; S B Park; J S Kim; I Y Kim; S I Kim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.602

View more
  15 in total

1.  Differences in Femoral Torsion Among Various Measurement Methods Increase in Hips With Excessive Femoral Torsion.

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Till D Lerch; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast; Simon D Steppacher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Femoral anteversion in THA and its lack of correlation with native acetabular anteversion.

Authors:  William L Bargar; Amir A Jamali; Amir H Nejad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Evaluation of patello-femoral alignment by CT scans: interobserver reliability of several parameters.

Authors:  Luca Dei Giudici; Davide Enea; Laura Pierdicca; Stefano Cecconi; Serena Ulisse; Serena Arima; Andrea Giovagnoni; Antonio Gigante
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Strong correlation between the morphology of the proximal femur and the geometry of the distal femoral trochlea.

Authors:  Samantha J Wright; Tim A E J Boymans; Bernd Grimm; Anthony W Miles; Oliver Kessler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Functional and anatomic orientation of the femoral head.

Authors:  David Wright; Cari Whyne; Michael Hardisty; Hans J Kreder; Omri Lubovsky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  MPR realignment increases accuracy when measuring femoral neck anteversion angle.

Authors:  Tommy Hemmert Olesen; Trine Torfing; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  A quasi-brittle continuum damage finite element model of the human proximal femur based on element deletion.

Authors:  Ridha Hambli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 8.  [Torsional deformities of the femur in patients with femoroacetabular impingement : Dynamic 3D impingement simulation can be helpful for the planning of surgical hip dislocation and hip arthroscopy].

Authors:  Till D Lerch; Florian Schmaranzer; Markus S Hanke; Christiane Leibold; Simon D Steppacher; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  How Common Is Femoral Retroversion and How Is it Affected by Different Measurement Methods in Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis?

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Jennifer R Kallini; Mariana G Ferrer; Patricia E Miller; James D Wylie; Young-Jo Kim; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Best Practices: Hip Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Arvin B Kheterpal; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.