Literature DB >> 8496377

Femoral version and neck shaft angle.

F Miller1, M Merlo, Y Liang, P Kupcha, J Jamison, H T Harcke.   

Abstract

We measured femoral anteversion by the Kingsley-Olmsted method in 24 unpaired, dry femurs. When the head and neck of the same femurs were measured by computed tomography (CT) scan, measurement was 5 degrees less than the Kingsley-Olmsted method, whereas ultrasound of the head and neck was 5 degrees higher. An anterior flat plane was also defined to help measure anteversion in patients with a high neck shaft angle. Physical and ultrasound measurement correlated well with the previous measurement by the Kingsley-Olmsted method and CT scan of anteversion. Although measurement by CT scan and ultrasound are different their results are both reproducible and measure the same parameters; however, ultrasound measurement yields a number approximately 10 degrees higher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8496377     DOI: 10.1097/01241398-199305000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  3 in total

Review 1.  The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Jens Dargel; Johannes Oppermann; Peer Eysel; Max Joseph Scheyerer; Jan Bredow; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  3D femoral neck anteversion measurements based on the posterior femoral plane in ORTHODOC system.

Authors:  Yeon Soo Lee; Seung Hoon Oh; Jong Keun Seon; Eun Kyoo Song; Taek Rim Yoon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Femoral neck anteversion, acetabular anteversion and combined anteversion in the normal Indian adult population: A computed tomographic study.

Authors:  Aditya V Maheshwari; Michael P Zlowodzki; Gautam Siram; Anil K Jain
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.251

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.