Literature DB >> 11217876

Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 1: 3D imaging method.

J S Kim1, T S Park, S B Park, J S Kim1, I Y Kim, S I Kim.   

Abstract

Femoral neck anteversion is the torsion of the femoral head with reference to the distal femur. Conventional methods that use cross-sectional computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance or ultrasound images to estimate femoral anteversion have met with several problems owing to the complex, three-dimensional (3D) structure of the femur. These problems include not only the difficulty of defining the direction of the femoral neck axis and condylar line but also the dependency upon patient positioning. In particular, the femoral neck axis, the direction of the femoral head, known as the major source of error, is difficult to determine from either a single or several two-dimensional (2D) cross-sectional images. A new method has been devised for the measurement of femoral anteversion using the 3D imaging technique. 3D reconstructed CT images from the femoral head and trochanter to the distal femur are used to measure the anteversion. It is necessary to remove the soft tissue from the CT images and extract just the bone part. Then, the femoral anteversion is measured from a computer-rendered femur image. The 3D imaging method is compared with both the conventional 2D method and the physical method using 20 dried femurs. For the physical method, which is used as a reference value, a special apparatus is devised. The average difference between the results of the physical method and those of the 2D CT method is 5.33 degrees. The average difference between the results of the physical method and those of the 3D imaging method is 0.45 degrees. Seventy-four patients, who suffer from toe-in-gait disease, are tested to compare the 3D imaging method with the conventional 2D CT method. The average difference between the 2D and 3D methods is 8.6 degrees, and the standard is 7.43 degrees. This method provides a very accurate and reliable measurement of femoral anteversion, as it is virtually equivalent to the direct measurement of bisected dried femur in vitro.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11217876     DOI: 10.1007/bf02344864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  14 in total

1.  Roentgen examination of the proximal femur end in children and adolescents; a standardized technique also suitable for determination of the collum-, anteversion-, and epiphyseal angles; a study of slipped epiphysis and coxa plana.

Authors:  L BILLING
Journal:  Acta Radiol Suppl       Date:  1954

2.  Interactive display and analysis of 3-D medical images.

Authors:  R A Robb; C Barillot
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  CT measurement of anteversion in the femoral neck. The influence of femur positioning.

Authors:  K L Hermann; N Egund
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Anteversion of the femur and idiopathic osteoarthrosis of the hip.

Authors:  J H Wedge; I Munkacsi; D Loback
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Femoral anteversion.

Authors:  S B Murphy; S R Simon; P K Kijewski; R H Wilkinson; N T Griscom
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The anatomy and functional axes of the femur.

Authors:  Y Yoshioka; D Siu; T D Cooke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Evaluation of CT scans and 3-D reformatted images for quantitative assessment of the hip.

Authors:  M F Abel; D H Sutherland; D R Wenger; S J Mubarak
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  Femoral anteversion measured by the Dunlap/Rippstein and Norman methods.

Authors:  O Reikerås; A Høiseth; A Reigstad
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1985 May-Jun

9.  Femoral anatomy described in cylindrical coordinates using computed tomography.

Authors:  N Egund; J Palmer
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1984

10.  Practical considerations in the use of computed tomography in the measurement of femoral anteversion.

Authors:  D S Weiner; A J Cook
Journal:  Isr J Med Sci       Date:  1980-04
View more
  20 in total

1.  Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 2: 3D modelling method.

Authors:  J S Kim; T S Park; S B Park; J S Kim; I Y Kim; S I Kim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Three-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA): a method for reconstruction of human bones using a dual X-ray absorptiometry device.

Authors:  S Kolta; A Le Bras; D Mitton; V Bousson; J A de Guise; J Fechtenbaum; J D Laredo; C Roux; W Skalli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  3D femoral neck anteversion measurements based on the posterior femoral plane in ORTHODOC system.

Authors:  Yeon Soo Lee; Seung Hoon Oh; Jong Keun Seon; Eun Kyoo Song; Taek Rim Yoon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  A local reference frame for describing the proximal human femur: application in clinical settings.

Authors:  Milad Masjedi; Charison Tay; Simon J Harris; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  CORR Insights ®: Can femoral rotation be localized and quantified using standard CT measures?

Authors:  Christof Radler
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  A three-dimensional axis for the study of femoral neck orientation.

Authors:  Noémie Bonneau; Paul-Antoine Libourel; Caroline Simonis; Laurent Puymerail; Michel Baylac; Christine Tardieu; Olivier Gagey
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Determinants of Hip Displacement in Children With Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Chia Hsieh Chang; Ying Chih Wang; Pei Chi Ho; Ai Wen Hwang; Hsuan Kai Kao; Wei Chun Lee; Wen E Yang; Ken N Kuo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Closed intramedullary derotational osteotomy and hip arthroscopy for cam femoroacetabular impingement from femoral retroversion.

Authors:  Dean K Matsuda; Nikhil Gupta; Hal D Martin
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2014-01-10

9.  The Availability of Radiological Measurement of Femoral Anteversion Angle: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ha Young Byun; Heesuk Shin; Eun Shin Lee; Min Sik Kong; Seung Hun Lee; Chang Hee Lee
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2016-04-25

10.  MPR realignment increases accuracy when measuring femoral neck anteversion angle.

Authors:  Tommy Hemmert Olesen; Trine Torfing; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.