Literature DB >> 9213017

Effects of anteversion on femoral bone mineral density and geometry measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a cadaver study.

X G Cheng1, P H Nicholson, S Boonen, P Brys, G Lowet, J Nijs, J Dequeker.   

Abstract

The effect of femoral neck anteversion on bone mineral density (BMD) and geometry as measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was assessed using 64 right proximal femora from 36 male and 28 female cadavers. The anteversion angle was measured on computed tomography (CT) images, and DXA measurements were made both in the neutral position (i.e, at 0 degree anteversion, femoral neck axis parallel to the table) and in the simulated anteverted position (i.e., femoral shaft axis parallel to the table, greater and lesser trochanters in contact with the table, and femoral neck free). The mean anteversion angle measured by CT was 19.3 degrees (range 6 degrees-38 degrees). Anteversion was associated with a significant elevation in femoral neck BMD of +2.8% (range -5.3%-(+)9.8%) (p < 0.05), and the femoral neck BMD increased with increasing anteversion (p < 0.01). Trochanteric BMD was less affected by anteversion, with an average increase of only 0.2% (range -5%-5.9%) (p = n.s.) in the anteverted position, but there was a significant positive association between the change in trochanteric BMD and the anteversion angle (p < 0.01). Anteversion produced a mean reduction of -2.4% (range -7.6%-(+)4.3%) (p < 0.001) in apparent femoral neck axis length, while femoral neck width remained generally unaffected. These data confirm that femoral BMD as measured by DXA is affected by femoral anteversion with a lesser magnitude than previously reported. The use of trochanteric BMD may minimize the influence of anteversion. While the mean changes in BMD and neck axis length attributable to anteversion are modest, the considerable interindividual variability in the magnitude of the effects demonstrates that other factors, such as, the complex geometry of femoral neck modifies the effect of anteversion on BMD measurements. The error in BMD introduced femoral anteversion may represent a significant confounding influence in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Careful repositioning of the foot and leg is essential in monitoring changes in BMD longitudinally. Knowledge of the effects of femoral anteversion may assist in understanding the relation of femoral BMD and neck axis length to hip fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9213017     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(97)00083-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  8 in total

1.  Three-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA): a method for reconstruction of human bones using a dual X-ray absorptiometry device.

Authors:  S Kolta; A Le Bras; D Mitton; V Bousson; J A de Guise; J Fechtenbaum; J D Laredo; C Roux; W Skalli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  3D femoral neck anteversion measurements based on the posterior femoral plane in ORTHODOC system.

Authors:  Yeon Soo Lee; Seung Hoon Oh; Jong Keun Seon; Eun Kyoo Song; Taek Rim Yoon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  The Effect of Region of Interest on Measurement of Bone Mineral Density of the Proximal Femur: Simulation Analysis Using CT Images.

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Masaki Takao; Yoshito Otake; Makoto Iwasa; Hidetoshi Hamada; Wataru Ando; Yoshinobu Sato; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 4.  Femoral anteversion: significance and measurement.

Authors:  Matteo Scorcelletti; Neil D Reeves; Jörn Rittweger; Alex Ireland
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Coronary calcification and bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography from the São Paulo Ageing and Health (SPAH) Study.

Authors:  Luis Fernando Escobar Guzman; Neuza Helena Moreira Lopes; Georgea H Fernandes Torres; Liliam Takayama; Solange de Sousa Andrade; José Ramón Lanz-Luces; Rosa Maria R Pereira; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Temperature influence on DXA measurements: bone mineral density acquisition in frozen and thawed human femora.

Authors:  Dirk Wähnert; Konrad L Hoffmeier; Gabriele Lehmann; Rosemarie Fröber; Gunther O Hofmann; Thomas Mückley
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Hip axis length variation: its correlation with anthropometric measurements in women from three ethnic groups.

Authors:  P Clark; L J Tesoriero; D J Morton; J O Talavera; A Karlamangla; D L Schneider; W J Wooten; E Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: Pitfalls in measurement and interpretation of bone mineral density.

Authors:  M K Garg; Sandeep Kharb
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.