Literature DB >> 19714389

Femoral anteversion in THA and its lack of correlation with native acetabular anteversion.

William L Bargar1, Amir A Jamali, Amir H Nejad.   

Abstract

Several studies support the concept that, for optimum range of motion in THA, the combined femoral and acetabular anteversion should be some constant or fall within some "safe zone." When using a cementless femoral component, the surgeon has little control of the anteversion of the component since it is dictated by native femoral anteversion. Given this constraint, we asked whether the surgeon should use the native anteversion of the acetabulum as a target for implant position in THA. Forty-six patients scheduled for primary THA underwent CT scanning and preoperative planning using a computer workstation. The native acetabular anteversion and the native femoral anteversion were measured. Prosthetic femoral anteversion was measured on the workstation by three-dimensional templating of a straight-stemmed tapered implant. The mean of the sum of the native acetabular anteversion and native femoral anteversion was 28.9 degrees; however, 17% varied by 10 degrees to 15 degrees and 11% by more than 15 degrees. The mean of native femoral anteversion and prosthetic femoral anteversion was 13.8 degrees (range, -6.1 degrees-32.7 degrees) and 22.5 degrees (range, 1 degrees-39 degrees), respectively. Based on our data, we believe the surgeon should not use the native acetabular anteversion as a target for positioning the acetabular component.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19714389      PMCID: PMC2806998          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1040-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  12 in total

Review 1.  Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  D Tönnis; A Heinecke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.

Authors:  K-H Widmer; B Zurfluh
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  3D femoral neck anteversion measurements based on the posterior femoral plane in ORTHODOC system.

Authors:  Yeon Soo Lee; Seung Hoon Oh; Jong Keun Seon; Eun Kyoo Song; Taek Rim Yoon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  Impingement with total hip replacement.

Authors:  Aamer Malik; Aditya Maheshwari; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Variations in acetabular anatomy with reference to total hip replacement.

Authors:  P E Murtha; M A Hafez; B Jaramaz; A M DiGioia
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-03

6.  Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: high validity of the "cross-over-sign".

Authors:  Amir A Jamali; Kiril Mladenov; Dominik C Meyer; Alberto Martinez; Martin Beck; Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion.

Authors:  N Sugano; P C Noble; E Kamaric
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Computed tomography analysis of acetabular anteversion and abduction.

Authors:  Eric S Stem; Mary I O'Connor; Mark J Kransdorf; Julia Crook
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation.

Authors:  D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-03

10.  Primary and revision total hip replacement using the Robodoc system.

Authors:  W L Bargar; A Bauer; M Börner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  23 in total

1.  Multilevel measurement of acetabular version using 3-D CT-generated models: implications for hip preservation surgery.

Authors:  Aimee C Perreira; John C Hunter; Thaddeus Laird; Amir A Jamali
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The sagittal stem alignment and the stem version clearly influence the impingement-free range of motion in total hip arthroplasty: a computer model-based analysis.

Authors:  Michael Müller; Georg Duda; Carsten Perka; Stephan Tohtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Influencing factors for the increased stem version compared to the native femur in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Masanobu Hirata; Yasuharu Nakashima; Takashi Itokawa; Masanobu Ohishi; Taishi Sato; Mio Akiyama; Daisuke Hara; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Strong correlation between the morphology of the proximal femur and the geometry of the distal femoral trochlea.

Authors:  Samantha J Wright; Tim A E J Boymans; Bernd Grimm; Anthony W Miles; Oliver Kessler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Optimal anterior femoral offset for functional range of motion in total hip arthroplasty--a computer simulation study.

Authors:  Masanobu Hirata; Yasuharu Nakashima; Daisuke Hara; Masayuki Kanazawa; Yusuke Kohno; Kensei Yoshimoto; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Accuracy of combined anteversion in image-free navigated total hip arthroplasty: stem-first or cup-first technique?

Authors:  Shigeo Fukunishi; Shoji Nishio; Yuki Fujihara; Shohei Okahisa; Yu Takeda; Tomokazu Fukui; Shinichi Yoshiya
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Femoral anteversion is correlated with acetabular version and coverage in Asian women with anterior and global deficient subgroups of hip dysplasia: a CT study.

Authors:  Mio Akiyama; Yasuharu Nakashima; Masanori Fujii; Taishi Sato; Takuaki Yamamoto; Taro Mawatari; Goro Motomura; Shuichi Matsuda; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Functional Femoral Anteversion: Axial Rotation of the Femur and its Implications for Stem Version Targets in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Max Hardwick-Morris; Joshua Twiggs; Kunaal Kacker; Brad Miles; Jitendra Balakumar
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-10-12

9.  Combined anteversion of the total hip arthroplasty implanted with image-free cup navigation and without stem navigation.

Authors:  Shigeo Fukunishi; Tomokazu Fukui; Shoji Nishio; Yuki Fujihara; Shohei Okahisa; Shinichi Yoshiya
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2012-11-28

10.  Prevalence and characteristics of cam-type femoroacetabular deformity in 100 hips with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia: a case control study.

Authors:  Takahiro Ida; Yoshinari Nakamura; Tomonobu Hagio; Masatoshi Naito
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.