Literature DB >> 33474984

Best Practices: Hip Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Florian Schmaranzer1,2, Arvin B Kheterpal3, Miriam A Bredella3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Imaging plays a critical role in the assessment of patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). With better understanding of the underlying pathomechanics and advances in joint-preserving surgery, there is an increasing need to define the most appropriate imaging workup. The purpose of this article is to provide guidance on best practices for imaging of patients with FAI in light of recent advances in corrective FAI surgery. CONCLUSION. Pelvic radiography with dedicated hip projections is the basis of the diagnostic workup of patients with suspected FAI to assess arthritic changes and acetabular coverage and to screen for cam deformities. Chondrolabral lesions should be evaluated with unenhanced MRI or MR arthrography. The protocol should include a large-FOV fluid-sensitive sequence to exclude conditions that can mimic or coexist with FAI, radial imaging to accurately determine the presence of a cam deformity, and imaging of the distal femoral condyles for measurement of femoral torsion. CT remains a valuable tool for planning of complex surgical corrections. Advanced imaging, such as 3D simulation, biochemical MRI, and MR arthrography with application of leg traction, has great potential to improve surgical decision-making. Further research is needed to assess the added clinical value of these techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MR arthrography; MRI; femoroacetabular impingement; imaging workup; radiography

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33474984      PMCID: PMC8116615          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.20.22783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  99 in total

Review 1.  Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  D Tönnis; A Heinecke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Femoral antetorsion: comparing asymptomatic volunteers and patients with femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Reto Sutter; Tobias J Dietrich; Patrick O Zingg; Christian W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Hips With Protrusio Acetabuli Are at Increased Risk for Failure After Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A 10-year Followup.

Authors:  Markus S Hanke; Simon D Steppacher; Corinne A Zurmühle; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Computer-assisted femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty using a surgical milling device an in vitro accuracy study.

Authors:  Timo M Ecker; Marc Puls; Simon D Steppacher; Johannes D Bastian; Marius J B Keel; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Beyond the alpha angle: Alternative measurements for quantifying cam-type deformities in femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Christine Ehrmann; Andrea B Rosskopf; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Reto Sutter
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Measurement of Femoral Version by MRI is as Reliable and Reproducible as CT in Children and Adolescents With Hip Disorders.

Authors:  Khalid Hesham; Patrick M Carry; Krister Freese; Lauryn Kestel; Jamie R Stewart; Joshua A Delavan; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.324

7.  Low-Dose Computed Tomography Reduces Radiation Exposure by 90% Compared With Traditional Computed Tomography Among Patients Undergoing Hip-Preservation Surgery.

Authors:  Alvin W Su; Travis J Hillen; Eric P Eutsler; Asheesh Bedi; James R Ross; Christopher M Larson; John C Clohisy; Jeffrey J Nepple
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  MDCT arthrography of the hip: value of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique and potential for radiation dose reduction.

Authors:  Frank Tobalem; Eric Dugert; Francis R Verdun; Vincent Dunet; Julien G Ott; Hannes A Rudiger; Stephane Cherix; Reto Meuli; Fabio Becce
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Validity of gradient-echo three-dimensional delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of hip joint cartilage: a histologically controlled study.

Authors:  Christoph Zilkens; Falk Miese; Monika Herten; Sabine Kurzidem; Marcus Jäger; Dietmar König; Gerald Antoch; Rüdiger Krauspe; Bernd Bittersohl
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  Location of Intra- and Extra-articular Hip Impingement Is Different in Patients With Pincer-Type and Mixed-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement Due to Acetabular Retroversion or Protrusio Acetabuli on 3D CT-Based Impingement Simulation.

Authors:  Till D Lerch; Mathias Siegfried; Florian Schmaranzer; Christiane S Leibold; Corinne A Zurmühle; Markus S Hanke; Michael K Ryan; Simon D Steppacher; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Imaging in joint-preserving hip surgery].

Authors:  M K Meier; T D Lerch; M S Hanke; M Tannast; S D Steppacher; F Schmaranzer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Characteristics of Biomechanical and Physical Function According to Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Acetabular Impingement Syndrome in Young Adults.

Authors:  Junyong Zhang; Yonghwan Kim; Moonyoung Choi; Cong Zhang
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.