Literature DB >> 16823652

Early exposure to haptic feedback enhances performance in surgical simulator training: a prospective randomized crossover study in surgical residents.

P Ström1, L Hedman, L Särnå, A Kjellin, T Wredmark, L Felländer-Tsai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the literature of skill acquisition and transfer of skills, it often is assumed that the rate of skill acquisition depends on what has been learned in a similar context (i.e., surgical simulators providing haptic feedback). This study aimed to analyze whether the addition of haptic feedback early in the training phase for image-guided surgical simulation improves performance.
METHODS: A randomized crossover study design was used, in which 38 surgical residents were randomized to begin a 2-h simulator training session with either haptic or nonhaptic training followed by crossover after 1 h. The graphic context was a virtual upper abdomen. The residents performed two diathermy tasks. Two validated tests were used to control for differences in visual-spatial ability: the BasIQ general cognitive ability test and Mental Rotation Test A (MRT-A).
RESULTS: After 2 h of training, the group that had started with haptic feedback performed the two diathermy tasks significantly better (p < 0.05, unpaired t-test). Only the group that had started with haptic training significantly improved during the last 1-h session (p < 0.01, paired t-test).
CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that haptic feedback could be important in the early training phase of skill acquisition in image-guided surgical simulator training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16823652     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0545-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  O S Bholat; R S Haluck; W B Murray; P J Gorman; T M Krummel
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  A virtual reality module for intravenous catheter placement.

Authors:  J B Prystowsky; G Regehr; D A Rogers; J P Loan; L L Hiemenz; K M Smith
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Assessment of surgical competence.

Authors:  A Darzi; S Mackay
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-12

4.  Effect of visual-spatial ability on learning of spatially-complex surgical skills.

Authors:  Kyle R Wanzel; Stanley J Hamstra; Dimitri J Anastakis; Edward D Matsumoto; Michael D Cusimano
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-01-19       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Training in tasks with different visual-spatial components does not improve virtual arthroscopy performance.

Authors:  P Ström; A Kjellin; L Hedman; T Wredmark; L Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Predicting individual differences in complex skill acquisition: dynamics of ability determinants.

Authors:  P L Ackerman
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1992-10

8.  Application of haptic feedback to robotic surgery.

Authors:  Brian T Bethea; Allison M Okamura; Masaya Kitagawa; Torin P Fitton; Stephen M Cattaneo; Vincent L Gott; William A Baumgartner; David D Yuh
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.878

9.  A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test: different versions and factors that affect performance.

Authors:  M Peters; B Laeng; K Latham; M Jackson; R Zaiyouna; C Richardson
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  T P Grantcharov; V B Kristiansen; J Bendix; L Bardram; J Rosenberg; P Funch-Jensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  35 in total

1.  A head-to-head comparison between virtual reality and physical reality simulation training for basic skills acquisition.

Authors:  Constantinos Loukas; Nikolaos Nikiteas; Dimitrios Schizas; Vasileios Lahanas; Evangelos Georgiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Medical simulation in respiratory and critical care medicine.

Authors:  Godfrey Lam; Najib T Ayas; Donald E Griesdale; Adam D Peets
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 2.584

3.  Preliminary evaluation of the pattern cutting and the ligating loop virtual laparoscopic trainers.

Authors:  A Chellali; W Ahn; G Sankaranarayanan; J T Flinn; S D Schwaitzberg; D B Jones; Suvranu De; C G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Achieving Interface and Environment Fidelity in the Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Surgical Trainer.

Authors:  Amine Chellali; Helena Mentis; Amie Miller; Woojin Ahn; Venkata S Arikatla; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Suvranu De; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Caroline G L Cao
Journal:  Int J Hum Comput Stud       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 3.632

5.  The importance of haptic feedback in laparoscopic suturing training and the additive value of virtual reality simulation.

Authors:  Sanne M B I Botden; Fawaz Torab; Sonja N Buzink; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Haptic guided 3-D deformable image registration.

Authors:  Petter Risholm; Eigil Samset
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Validation of the ArthroS virtual reality simulator for arthroscopic skills.

Authors:  J J Stunt; G M M J Kerkhoffs; C N van Dijk; G J M Tuijthof
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Validation of the VBLaST peg transfer task: a first step toward an alternate training standard.

Authors:  A Chellali; L Zhang; G Sankaranarayanan; V S Arikatla; W Ahn; A Derevianko; S D Schwaitzberg; D B Jones; M DeMoya; C G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Low-Cost Haptic Simulation Using Material Fracture.

Authors:  David F Pepley; Hong-En Chen; Yichun Tang; Sanjib Das Adhikary; Scarlett R Miller; Jason Z Moore
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 10.  Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Allison M Okamura
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.309

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.