Allison M Okamura1. 1. Johns Hopkins University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA. aokamura@jhu.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RMIS) holds great promise for improving the accuracy and dexterity of a surgeon and minimizing trauma to the patient. However, widespread clinical success with RMIS has been marginal. It is hypothesized that the lack of haptic (force and tactile) feedback presented to the surgeon is a limiting factor. This review explains the technical challenges of creating haptic feedback for robot-assisted surgery and provides recent results that evaluate the effectiveness of haptic feedback in mock surgical tasks. RECENT FINDINGS: Haptic feedback systems for RMIS are still under development and evaluation. Most provide only force feedback, with limited fidelity. The major challenge at this time is sensing forces applied to the patient. A few tactile feedback systems for RMIS have been created, but their practicality for clinical implementation needs to be shown. It is particularly difficult to sense and display spatially distributed tactile information. The cost-benefit ratio for haptic feedback in RMIS has not been established. SUMMARY: The designs of existing commercial RMIS systems are not conducive for force feedback, and creative solutions are needed to create compelling tactile feedback systems. Surgeons, engineers, and neuroscientists should work together to develop effective solutions for haptic feedback in RMIS.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RMIS) holds great promise for improving the accuracy and dexterity of a surgeon and minimizing trauma to the patient. However, widespread clinical success with RMIS has been marginal. It is hypothesized that the lack of haptic (force and tactile) feedback presented to the surgeon is a limiting factor. This review explains the technical challenges of creating haptic feedback for robot-assisted surgery and provides recent results that evaluate the effectiveness of haptic feedback in mock surgical tasks. RECENT FINDINGS: Haptic feedback systems for RMIS are still under development and evaluation. Most provide only force feedback, with limited fidelity. The major challenge at this time is sensing forces applied to the patient. A few tactile feedback systems for RMIS have been created, but their practicality for clinical implementation needs to be shown. It is particularly difficult to sense and display spatially distributed tactile information. The cost-benefit ratio for haptic feedback in RMIS has not been established. SUMMARY: The designs of existing commercial RMIS systems are not conducive for force feedback, and creative solutions are needed to create compelling tactile feedback systems. Surgeons, engineers, and neuroscientists should work together to develop effective solutions for haptic feedback in RMIS.
Authors: Justin H Killebrew; Sliman J Bensmaïa; John F Dammann; Peter Denchev; Steven S Hsiao; James C Craig; Kenneth O Johnson Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2006-11-28 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Carol E Reiley; Takintope Akinbiyi; Darius Burschka; David C Chang; Allison M Okamura; David D Yuh Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Daniel T Friedrich; L Dürselen; B Mayer; S Hacker; F Schall; J Hahn; T K Hoffmann; P J Schuler; J Greve Journal: J Robot Surg Date: 2017-05-03
Authors: Christopher R Wottawa; Jeremiah R Cohen; Richard E Fan; James W Bisley; Martin O Culjat; Warren S Grundfest; Erik P Dutson Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-12-12 Impact factor: 4.584