Literature DB >> 10204565

A virtual reality module for intravenous catheter placement.

J B Prystowsky1, G Regehr, D A Rogers, J P Loan, L L Hiemenz, K M Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) is a potential tool for technical skills training. We tested the validity and instructional effectiveness of a prototype VR module for learning intravenous (i.v.) catheter placement.
METHODS: First-year medical students (n = 37), third-year medical students (n = 14), and surgical residents (n = 9) attempted two pretest i.v.s into each other, used the VR module for 12 minutes, and subsequently attempted two posttest i.v.s. Success or failure were recorded for each attempt. For each successful attempt, time and global rating of i.v. insertion were also recorded.
RESULTS: The pretest success rate was significantly different between groups (chi square = 28.71, P <0.01). VR success rate was not significantly different between groups (F(2,57) = 1.47, ns). Although there was improvement in all groups during VR training (F(2,114) = 44.16, P <0.01), this did not result in improvement in posttest performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences between groups were observed in performance of i.v. insertion in physical reality. However, no significant difference was observed in performance in VR. Thus, performance in VR demonstrated neither construct nor concurrent validity. While performance improved in VR, transfer of skill from VR to physical reality was not observed. Additional development and testing of VR as a training tool is warranted before its widespread use can be recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10204565     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00328-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  9 in total

1.  Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators.

Authors:  F J Carter; M P Schijven; R Aggarwal; T Grantcharov; N K Francis; G B Hanna; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Early exposure to haptic feedback enhances performance in surgical simulator training: a prospective randomized crossover study in surgical residents.

Authors:  P Ström; L Hedman; L Särnå; A Kjellin; T Wredmark; L Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The role of simulation in neurosurgery.

Authors:  Giselle Coelho; Nelci Zanon; Benjamin Warf
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Development of a vibration haptic simulator for shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan R Kusins; Jason A Strelzow; Marie-Eve LeBel; Louis M Ferreira
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Successful intravenous catheterization by medical students.

Authors:  Ingrid A Woelfel; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Identifying and reducing errors with surgical simulation.

Authors:  M P Fried; R Satava; S Weghorst; A G Gallagher; C Sasaki; D Ross; M Sinanan; J I Uribe; M Zeltsan; H Arora; H Cuellar
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10

Review 8.  A Systematic Review of the World of Validated Suprapubic Catheter Insertion Simulation Trainers: From 'Head-Blocks' to 'Lunch Boxes'.

Authors:  James Nonde; Abdullah Ebrahim Laher; Jared McDowall; Ahmed Adam
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2020-01-07

9.  Development and initial validation of a cost-effective, re-usable, ultrasound-compatible suprapubic catheter insertion training simulator.

Authors:  Harkanwal Randhawa; Yuding Wang; Jen Hoogenes; Michael Uy; Bobby Shayegan; Anil Kapoor; Edward D Matsumoto
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.862

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.