Literature DB >> 11700382

Assessment of surgical competence.

A Darzi1, S Mackay.   

Abstract

This paper examines the issues that arise in the broad area of competence assessment in surgical practice, with particular reference to the objective assessment of technical skill which has historically been the weakest aspect of assessment in surgical training. To facilitate a thorough appraisal of competence, a simple model of surgical practice is advanced, followed by a review of both current and experimental methods of assessing technical skill. The review comprises not only the published literature, but also work (both from the authors' and other groups) that is in progress or under consideration for publication. Significant issues in the implementation of these new technologies, especially the necessary further validation, and the imperative to demonstrate that the process introduced does indeed improve the outcomes are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11700382      PMCID: PMC1765754          DOI: 10.1136/qhc.0100064..

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Care        ISSN: 0963-8172


  21 in total

Review 1.  The role of simulation in surgical training.

Authors:  J Torkington; S G Smith; B I Rees; A Darzi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Objective assessment of surgical dexterity using simulators.

Authors:  S G Smith; J Torkington; A Darzi
Journal:  Hosp Med       Date:  1999-09

3.  Early experience and validation work with Procedicus VA--the Prosolvia virtual reality shoulder arthroscopy trainer.

Authors:  S Smith; A Wan; N Taffinder; S Read; R Emery; A Darzi
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  1999

4.  The challenge of objective assessment of surgical skill.

Authors:  A Darzi; V Datta; S Mackay
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons.

Authors:  N Taffinder; S G Smith; J Huber; R C Russell; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A comprehensive examination for senior surgical residents.

Authors:  H MacRae; G Regehr; W Leadbetter; R K Reznick
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Teaching and testing technical skills.

Authors:  R K Reznick
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  The Objective Structured Clinical Examination. The new gold standard for evaluating postgraduate clinical performance.

Authors:  D A Sloan; M B Donnelly; R W Schwartz; W E Strodel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Guidelines for estimating the real cost of an objective structured clinical examination.

Authors:  R K Reznick; S Smee; J S Baumber; R Cohen; A Rothman; D Blackmore; M Bérard
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  A new approach to a final examination in surgery. Use of the objective structured clinical examination.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; F A Gleeson; R M Harden; R A Wood
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 1.891

View more
  27 in total

1.  Significant transfer of surgical skills obtained with an advanced laparoscopic training program to a laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy in a live porcine model: feasibility of learning advanced laparoscopy in a general surgery residency.

Authors:  Julián Varas; Ricardo Mejía; Arnoldo Riquelme; Felipe Maluenda; Erwin Buckel; José Salinas; Jorge Martínez; Rajesh Aggarwal; Nicolás Jarufe; Camilo Boza
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Early exposure to haptic feedback enhances performance in surgical simulator training: a prospective randomized crossover study in surgical residents.

Authors:  P Ström; L Hedman; L Särnå; A Kjellin; T Wredmark; L Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  The reporting of randomized clinical trials using a surgical intervention is in need of immediate improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Isabelle Jacquier; Isabelle Boutron; David Moher; Carine Roy; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Visuospatial and technical ability in the selection and assessment of higher surgical trainees in the London deanery.

Authors:  P Tansley; S Kakar; S Withey; P Butler
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Construct validity of the ProMIS laparoscopic simulator.

Authors:  Michael G C Pellen; Liam F Horgan; J Roger Barton; Stephen E Attwood
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic surgical skills assessment: can simulators replace experts?

Authors:  Michael Pellen; Liam Horgan; J Roger Barton; Stephen Attwood
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Objective assessment of robotic surgical skill using instrument contact vibrations.

Authors:  Ernest D Gomez; Rajesh Aggarwal; William McMahan; Karlin Bark; Katherine J Kuchenbecker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Cognitive and Technical Skill Assessment in Surgical Education: a Changing Horizon.

Authors:  Ashley Vergis; Krista Hardy
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 0.656

9.  A computer vision technique for automated assessment of surgical performance using surgeons' console-feed videos.

Authors:  Amir Baghdadi; Ahmed A Hussein; Youssef Ahmed; Lora A Cavuoto; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Development and validation of assessment measures for a newly developed physical examination simulator.

Authors:  Carla M Pugh; Patricia Youngblood
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.